PDM- 3.31.13 8K Q1 ER and Supp Schedules


 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 8-K
 
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  May 2, 2013
 
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Commission File Number:  001-34626
 
Maryland
  
58-2328421
(State or other jurisdiction of
  
(IRS Employer
incorporation)
  
Identification No.)

11695 Johns Creek Parkway
Suite 350
Johns Creek, GA 30097-1523
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 
770-418-8800
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
 
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
[  ]   Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[  ]   Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

[  ]   Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

[  ]   Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
 
 
 





Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition

On May 2, 2013, Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Registrant”) issued a press release announcing its financial results for the first quarter 2013, and published supplemental information for the first quarter 2013 to its website. The press release and the supplemental information are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and 99.2, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such exhibits and the information set forth therein are deemed to have been furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits

(d) Exhibits:

Exhibit No.
 
Description
99.1
 
Press release dated May 2, 2013.
 
 
 
99.2
 
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. Quarterly Supplemental Information for the First Quarter 2013.









SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Current Report on Form 8-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
 
 
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
 
Date: May 2, 2013
 
By:
 
/s/    Robert E. Bowers
 
 
 
 
Robert E. Bowers
 
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

 





EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.
 
Description
99.1
 
Press release dated May 2, 2013.
 
 
 
99.2
 
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. Quarterly Supplemental Information for the First Quarter 2013.




PDM- 3.31.13 EX 99.1 Q1 2013 ER


Exhibit 99.1


Piedmont Office Realty Trust Reports First Quarter Results
ATLANTA, May 2, 2013 --Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. ("Piedmont" or the "Company") (NYSE:PDM), an owner of primarily Class A properties located predominantly in the ten largest U.S. office markets, today announced its results for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
Highlights for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013:
Achieved Core Funds From Operations ("CFFO") of $0.37 per diluted share for the quarter;
Purchased two properties in our concentration markets;
Disposed of one non-core asset and contracted to sell another opportunistic investment;
Completed 487,000 square feet of leasing.

Donald A. Miller, CFA, President and Chief Executive Officer stated, “We executed well this quarter from a transactional perspective. We bought two Class A properties in our targeted concentration markets, disposed of another non-core asset, and locked in value creation for our stockholders through the sale of 1200 Enclave. At the same time, we also delivered solid operational results. Although our leasing activity was lighter than it has been for the last several quarters, we feel good about the pipeline for the remainder of 2013.”

Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

Piedmont's net income available to common stockholders for the first quarter of 2013 was $14.7 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, as compared with $37.2 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2012. The first quarter results of the prior year included $17.8 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, in gain on sale associated with properties that were sold during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The current quarter includes a $6.4 million, or $0.04 per diluted share, impairment loss recognized in conjunction with the write-down in value and subsequent sale of the 1111 Durham Avenue property. Income from continuing operations increased from $0.11 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2012 to $0.13 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 were $134.3 million, as compared with $131.1 million for the same period a year ago, primarily reflecting increased revenues associated with the commencement of several significant leases over the previous twelve months as well as the acquisition of two additional properties during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.
Property operating costs were $52.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, which was comparable to the prior period of $51.7 million. General and administrative expense decreased approximately $0.7 million compared to the previous year's first quarter primarily due to a decrease in legal expense.
Funds From Operations ("FFO") for the current quarter totaled $60.2 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, as compared with $60.0 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2012. The prior year's first quarter included $0.01 per diluted share in FFO contribution associated with eight properties that were sold subsequent to January 1, 2012.





Core FFO, which primarily excludes transaction costs associated with two acquisitions made during the quarter, totaled $61.6 million, or $0.37 per diluted share, for the current quarter, as compared to $60.0 million, or $0.35 per diluted share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2012. The first quarter of 2012 included $0.01 per diluted share in Core FFO contribution associated with eight properties that were sold subsequent to January 1, 2012.
Adjusted FFO (“AFFO”) for the first quarter of 2013 totaled $36.6 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, as compared to $50.1 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, in the first quarter of 2012, reflecting increased capital expenditures associated with re-tenanting certain properties.
Leasing Update
During the first quarter of 2013, the Company executed approximately 487,000 square feet of leasing throughout its markets. Of the leases signed during the quarter, approximately 367,000 square feet, or 75%, was renewal-related and 120,000 square feet, or 25%, was with new tenants.
Same store net operating income (on a cash basis) for the quarter of $75.5 million was comparable to the quarter ended March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had approximately 0.4 million square feet of signed leases that have yet to commence for vacant spaces and an additional 2.0 million square feet of commenced leases that were in some form of abatement.
The Company's overall portfolio was 86.0% leased as of March 31, 2013, with a weighted average lease term remaining of approximately 7.1 years, a 6 month increase from a year ago. The stabilized portfolio was 88.9% leased as of March 31, 2013 as compared to 87.5% leased as of March 31, 2012. Details outlining Piedmont's significant upcoming lease expirations and the status of current leasing activity can be found in the Company's quarterly supplemental information package.
Capital Markets, Financing and Other Activities
As previously announced, during the three months ended March 31, 2013, Piedmont acquired two properties, Arlington Gateway in the Washington D.C. office market and 5&15 Wayside Road in the Boston market.

Arlington Gateway is a twelve-story, Class-A office property located at 901 North Glebe Road in Arlington, VA. Piedmont acquired the 334,000 square foot office building for approximately $175.6 million or $526 per square foot. Constructed in 2005, this LEED Gold and Energy Star Certified trophy property is located on the Metro line in the desirable Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor and is 99% leased exclusively to non-government tenants.

5 & 15 Wayside Road is a Class-A office project located in Burlington, Massachusetts. The 271,000 square foot office complex is comprised of two interconnected, four-story and five-story office buildings constructed in 1999 and 2001. The complex is currently 95% leased to three tenants.

Additionally during the quarter, Piedmont disposed of 1111 Durham Avenue, a non-core asset located in South Plainfield, NJ.  A long-term lease expired during the first quarter of 2013, and after assessing the aged building (constructed in 1975) and leasing prospects, Piedmont determined that the sale price should appropriately represent the land value of the asset. As a result, Piedmont disposed of the 1111 Durham Avenue building for a gross sale price of approximately $4.0 million, exclusive of closing costs. The





Company recognized a $6.4 million, non-cash impairment charge in conjunction with reclassifying the asset to held-for-sale.

Finally, during the first quarter, Piedmont entered into a contract to sell 1200 Enclave Parkway for approximately $48.8 million, or $326 per square foot. Piedmont acquired this property in early 2011 for $18.5 million. The 150,000 square foot building was constructed in 1999 and was approximately 18% leased when acquired. During 2012, we completed two leases with Schlumberger Technology Corporation which effectively leased 97% of the building to a credit-worthy tenant through 2024. The sale was completed on May 1, 2013.
Piedmont's gross assets amounted to $5.5 billion as of March 31, 2013. Total debt was approximately $1.7 billion as of March 31, 2013 as compared to $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2012. The Company's total debt-to-gross assets ratio was 30.8% as of March 31, 2013 as compared with 27.2% as of December 31, 2012. Net debt to annualized core EBITDA ratio was 5.2 x and the Company`s fixed charge coverage ratio was 4.8 x times. As of March 31, 2013, Piedmont had cash and capacity on its unsecured line of credit of approximately $86.2 million.
Subsequent to Quarter End
Dividend
On May 2, 2013, the Board of Directors of Piedmont declared a dividend for the second quarter of 2013 in the amount of $0.20 per common share outstanding to stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 31, 2013. Such dividends are to be paid on June 21, 2013.
Guidance for 2013
Based on management's expectations, the Company affirms its previous financial guidance for full-year 2013 as follows:

Low    High
Net Income                        $80 --    98 Million
Add: Depreciation and Amortization            $155 -- 160 Million
Deduct: Estimated Insurance Recoveries        $10 -- 15 Million

Core FFO                        $225 -    243 Million
Core FFO per diluted share                $1.35 - $1.45

These estimates reflect management's view of current market conditions and incorporate certain economic and operational assumptions and projections such as the move out of two governmental tenants and the decrease in net operations as a result of the sale of seven assets during 2012. This annual guidance includes the continued repositioning of the portfolio with estimated dispositions and acquisitions approximating $300 million and $400 million, respectively, during 2013. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Note that individual quarters may fluctuate on both a cash basis and an accrual basis due to lease commencements and expirations, the timing of repairs and maintenance, capital expenditures, capital markets activities and one-time revenue or expense events. In addition, the Company's guidance is based on information available to management as of the date of this release.





Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This release contains certain supplemental non-GAAP financial measures such as FFO, AFFO, Core FFO, Same store net operating income, and Core EBITDA. See below for definitions and reconciliations of these metrics to their most comparable GAAP metric.
Conference Call Information
Piedmont has scheduled a conference call and an audio webcast for Friday, May 3, 2013 at 10:00 A.M. Eastern daylight time ("EDT"). The live audio webcast of the call may be accessed on the Company's website at www.piedmontreit.com in the Investor Relations section. Dial-in numbers are (888) 430-8709 for participants in the United States and Canada and (719)325-2354 for international participants. The passcode is 4302736. A replay of the conference call will be available from 1:00 pm EDT on May 3, 2013 until 1:00 pm EDT on May 17, 2013, and can be accessed by dialing (888)203-1112 for participants in the United States and Canada and (719)457-0820 for international participants, followed by passcode 4302736. A webcast replay will also be available after the conference call in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website. During the audio webcast and conference call, the Company's management team will review first quarter 2013 performance, discuss recent events and conduct a question-and-answer period.
Supplemental Information
Quarterly Supplemental Information as of and for the period ended March 31, 2013 can be accessed on the Company`s website under the Investor Relations section at www.piedmontreit.com.
About Piedmont Office Realty Trust
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: PDM) is a fully-integrated and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in high-quality, Class A office properties located primarily in the ten largest U.S. office markets, including Chicago, Washington, D.C., New York, Los Angeles, Boston, and Dallas. As of March 31, 2013, Piedmont's 75 wholly-owned office buildings were comprised of over 20 million rentable square feet. The Company is headquartered in Atlanta, GA, with local management offices in each of its major markets. Piedmont is investment-grade rated by Standard & Poor's and Moody's and has maintained a low-leverage strategy while acquiring and disposing of properties during its fourteen year operating history.  For more information, see www.piedmontreit.com.

Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this press release constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The Company intends for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable. Such information is subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of the Company`s performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "believe," "continue" or similar words or phrases that are





predictions of future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. Examples of such statements in this press release include the Company`s expected leasing pipeline and estimated range of Net Income, Depreciation and Amortization, Insurance Recoveries, Core FFO and Core FFO per diluted share for the year ending December 31, 2013.  
The following are some of the factors that could cause the Company`s actual results and its expectations to differ materially from those described in the Company`s forward-looking statements: market and economic conditions remain challenging and the demand for office space, rental rates and property values may continue to lag the general economic recovery causing the Company's business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and access to capital to be adversely affected or otherwise impact performance, including the potential recognition of impairment charges; the success of the Company's real estate strategies and investment objectives, including the Company's ability to identify and consummate suitable acquisitions; lease terminations or lease defaults, particularly by one of the Company's large lead tenants; the impact of competition on the Company's efforts to renew existing leases or re-let space on terms similar to existing leases; changes in the economies and other conditions of the office market in general and of the specific markets in which the Company operates, particularly in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and the New York metropolitan area; economic and regulatory changes, including accounting standards, that impact the real estate market generally; additional risks and costs associated with directly managing properties occupied by government tenants; adverse market and economic conditions may continue to adversely affect the Company and could cause the Company to recognize impairment charges or otherwise impact the Company's performance; availability of financing and the Company's lending banks' ability to honor existing line of credit commitments; costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations; uncertainties associated with environmental and other regulatory matters; potential changes in political environment and reduction in federal and/or state funding of the Company's governmental tenants; the Company may be subject to litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition; the Company's ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code; and other factors detailed in the Company`s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, and other documents the Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release. The Company cannot guarantee the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this press release, and the Company does not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Research Analysts/ Institutional Investors Contact:
Eddie Guilbert
770-418-8592
research.analysts@piedmontreit.com

Shareholder Services/Transfer Agent Services Contact:
Computershare, Inc.
866-354-3485
investor.services@piedmontreit.com







Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
(unaudited)
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
Real estate assets, at cost:
 
 
 
 
Land
$
666,479

 
$
626,076

 
Buildings and improvements
3,962,295

 
3,770,799

 
Buildings and improvements, accumulated depreciation
(902,978
)
 
(883,008
)
 
Intangible lease asset
138,085

 
122,685

 
Intangible lease asset, accumulated amortization
(67,333
)
 
(67,940
)
 
Construction in progress
29,487

 
20,373

 
Real estate assets held for sale, gross
26,109

 
24,696

 
Real estate assets held for sale, accumulated depreciation and amortization
(1,155
)
 
(949
)
 
Total real estate assets
3,850,989

 
3,612,732

 
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures
37,835

 
37,226

 
Cash and cash equivalents
17,575

 
12,957

 
Tenant receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
29,237

 
25,038

 
Straight line rent receivable
124,460

 
120,110

 
Due from unconsolidated joint ventures
458

 
463

 
Escrow deposits and restricted cash
683

 
334

 
Prepaid expenses and other assets
12,724

 
13,022

 
Interest rate swap
1,712

 
1,075

 
Goodwill
180,097

 
180,097

 
Deferred financing costs, less accumulated amortization
5,908

 
6,454

 
Deferred lease costs, less accumulated amortization
271,337

 
240,140

 
Other assets held for sale
5,646

 
5,227

 
Total assets
$
4,538,661

 
$
4,254,875

 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Line of credit and notes payable
$
1,699,525

 
$
1,416,525

 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and accrued capital expenditures
139,273

 
127,263

 
Deferred income
23,585

 
21,552

 
Intangible lease liabilities, less accumulated amortization
45,215

 
40,805

 
Interest rate swaps
8,443

 
8,235

 
Total liabilities
1,916,041

 
1,614,380

 
Stockholders' equity :
 
 
 
 
Common stock
1,676

 
1,676

 
Additional paid in capital
3,667,614

 
3,667,051

 
Cumulative distributions in excess of earnings
(1,041,552
)
 
(1,022,681
)
 
Other comprehensive loss
(6,731
)
 
(7,160
)
 
Piedmont stockholders' equity
2,621,007

 
2,638,886

 
Non-controlling interest
1,613

 
1,609

 
Total stockholders' equity
2,622,620

 
2,640,495

 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
4,538,661

 
$
4,254,875

 
Net Debt (Debt less cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and escrows)
1,681,267

 
1,403,234

 
Total Gross Assets (1)
5,510,127

 
5,206,772

 
Number of shares of common stock outstanding at end of period
167,555

 
167,556

 
(1) Total assets exclusive of accumulated depreciation and amortization related to real estate assets.






Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
 
 
Unaudited (in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013
 
3/31/2012
Revenues:
 
 
 
Rental income
$
108,021

 
$
103,875

Tenant reimbursements
25,652

 
26,513

Property management fee revenue
631

 
574

Other rental income

 
124

Total revenues
134,304

 
131,086

 
 
 
 
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
Property operating costs
52,892

 
51,691

Depreciation
29,420

 
26,852

Amortization
9,117

 
12,614

General and administrative
4,549

 
5,257

Total operating expenses
95,978

 
96,414

 
 
 
 
Real estate operating income
38,326

 
34,672

 
 
 
 
Other income (expense):
 
 
 
Interest expense
(16,373
)
 
(16,537
)
Interest and other income (expense)
(1,277
)
 
97

Net casualty loss
(161
)
 

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
395

 
170

Total other income (expense)
(17,416
)
 
(16,270
)
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
20,910

 
18,402

 
 
 
 
Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
Operating income
147

 
999

Impairment loss
(6,402
)
 

Gain on sale of real estate assets

 
17,830

Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
(6,255
)
 
18,829

 
 
 
 
Net income
14,655

 
37,231

 
 
 
 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
(4
)
 
(4
)
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Piedmont
$14,651
 
$37,227
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
167,810

 
172,874

 
 
 
 
Per Share Information -- diluted:
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
0.13

 
$
0.11

Income/(loss) from discontinued operations
$
(0.04
)
 
$
0.11

Net income available to common stockholders
$
0.09

 
$
0.22






Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
 
 
 
Funds From Operations, Core Funds From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations
Unaudited (in thousands, except for per share data)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013
 
3/31/2012
Net income attributable to Piedmont
$
14,651

 
$
37,227

 
 
 
 
Depreciation (1) (2)
29,886

 
27,809

Amortization (1)
9,220

 
12,840

(Gain)/loss on sale of real estate assets (1)

 
(17,830
)
Impairment loss on real estate assets
6,402

 

Funds from operations*
60,159

 
60,046

 
 
 
 
Net casualty loss
161

 

Acquisition costs
1,244

 
(3
)
Core funds from operations*
61,564

 
60,043

 
 
 
 
Depreciation of non real estate assets
98

 
93

Stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense
594

 
334

Deferred financing cost amortization
594

 
803

Straight-line effects of lease revenue (1)
(4,032
)
 
(1,565
)
Net effect of amortization of below-market in-place lease intangibles(1)
(1,065
)
 
(1,532
)
Acquisition costs
(1,244
)
 
3

Non-incremental capital expenditures (3)
(19,920
)
 
(8,066
)
Adjusted funds from operations*
$
36,589

 
$
50,113

 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
167,810

 
172,874

 
 
 
 
Funds from operations per share (diluted)
$0.36
 
$0.35
Core funds from operations per share (diluted)
$0.37
 
$0.35
Adjusted funds from operations per share (diluted)
$0.22
 
$0.29

(1) Includes adjustments for consolidated properties, including discontinued operations, and for our proportionate share of amounts attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures.
(2) Excludes depreciation of non real estate assets.
(3) Capital expenditures of a recurring nature related to tenant improvements and leasing commissions that do not incrementally enhance the underlying assets' income generating capacity. Tenant improvements, leasing commissions, building capital and deferred lease incentives incurred to lease space that was vacant at acquisition, leasing costs for spaces vacant for greater than one year, leasing costs for spaces at newly acquired properties for which in-place leases expire shortly after acquisition, improvements associated with the expansion of a building and renovations that change the underlying classification of a building are excluded from this measure.

*Definitions

Funds From Operations ("FFO"): FFO is calculated in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") definition. NAREIT currently defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property and impairment losses, adding back depreciation and amortization on real estate assets, and after the same adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. These adjustments can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates. FFO may provide valuable comparisons of operating performance between periods and with other REITs. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income. We believe that FFO is a beneficial indicator of the performance of an equity REIT.





However, other REITs may not define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do; therefore, our computation of FFO may not be comparable to that of such other REITs.

Core Funds From Operations ("Core FFO"): We calculate Core FFO by starting with FFO, as defined by NAREIT, and adjusting for certain non-recurring items such as gains or losses on the early extinguishment of debt, acquisition-related costs and other significant non-recurring items. Such items create significant earnings volatility. We believe Core FFO provides a meaningful measure of our operating performance and more predictability regarding future earnings potential. Core FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income; therefore, it should not be compared to other REITs' equivalent to Core FFO.

Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO"): AFFO is calculated by deducting from Core FFO non-incremental capital expenditures and acquisition-related costs and adding back non-cash items including non-real estate depreciation, straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue, non-cash components of interest expense and compensation expense, and by making similar adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Although AFFO may not be comparable to that of other REITs, we believe it provides a meaningful indicator of our ability to fund cash needs and to make cash distributions to equity owners. AFFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities or as a measure of our liquidity.





Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
 
 
 
Core EBITDA, Property Net Operating Income, Same Store Net Operating Income
Unaudited (in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013
 
3/31/2012
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Piedmont
$
14,651

 
$
37,227

 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
4

 
4

Interest expense
16,373

 
16,537

Depreciation (1)
29,984

 
27,902

Amortization (1)
9,220

 
12,840

Acquisition Costs
1,244

 
(3
)
Impairment loss
6,402

 

Net casualty (gain)/loss
161

 

(Gain) / loss on sale of properties (1)

 
(17,830
)
Core EBITDA*
78,039

 
76,677

 
 
 
 
General & administrative expenses(1)
4,609

 
5,318

Management fee revenue
(631
)
 
(574
)
Interest and other income
21

 
(94
)
Lease termination income

 
(123
)
Lease termination expense - straight line rent & acquisition intangibles write-offs
25

 
99

Straight line rent adjustment(1)
(4,057
)
 
(1,664
)
Net effect of amortization of below-market in-place lease intangibles(1)
(1,065
)
 
(1,532
)
Property Net Operating Income (cash basis)*
76,941

 
78,107

 
 
 
 
Acquisitions
(836
)
 

Dispositions
166

 
(1,928
)
Unconsolidated joint ventures
(744
)
 
(590
)
 
 
 
 
Same Store NOI*
$
75,527

 
$
75,589

 
 
 
 
Change period over period in same store NOI
(0.1)%
 
N/A
 
 
 
 
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Core EBITDA/ Interest Expense)(2)
4.8
 
 
Annualized Core EBITDA (Core EBITDA x 4)
$312,156
 
 

(1) Includes amounts attributable to consolidated properties, including discontinued operations, and our proportionate share of amounts attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures.
(2) Piedmont had no capitalized interest, principal amortization or preferred dividends for any of the periods presented.

*Definitions

Core EBITDA: Core EBITDA is defined as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and incrementally removing any impairment losses, gains or losses from sales of property, or other significant non-recurring items. We do not include impairment losses in this measure because we feel these types of losses create volatility in our earnings and make it difficult to determine the earnings generated by our ongoing business. We believe Core EBITDA is a reasonable measure of our liquidity. Core EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of cash flows from operating activities or other GAAP basis liquidity measures. Other REITs may calculate Core EBITDA differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.






Property Net Operating Income ("Property NOI"): Property NOI is defined as real estate operating income with the add-back of corporate general and administrative expense, depreciation and amortization, and impairment losses and the deduction of income and expense associated with lease terminations and income associated with property management performed by Piedmont for other organizations. We present this measure on an accrual basis and a cash basis, which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. The Company uses this measure to assess its operating results and believes it is important in assessing operating performance. Property NOI is a non-GAAP measure which does not have any standard meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.

Same Store Net Operating Income ("Same Store NOI"): Same Store NOI is calculated as the Property NOI attributable to the properties owned or placed in service during the entire span of the current and prior year reporting periods. Same Store NOI excludes amounts attributable to unconsolidated joint venture assets. We present this measure on an accrual basis and a cash basis, which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. We believe Same Store NOI is an important measure of comparison of our properties' operating performance from one period to another. Other REITs may calculate Same Store NOI differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.


PDM-3.31.13 EX 99.2 Q1 '13 Supplemental



EXHIBIT 99.2








Quarterly Supplemental Information
March 31, 2013










Corporate Headquarters
Institutional Analyst Contact
Investor Relations
11695 Johns Creek Parkway, Suite 350
Telephone: 770.418.8592
Telephone: 866.354.3485
Johns Creek, GA 30097
research.analysts@piedmontreit.com
investor.services@piedmontreit.com
Telephone: 770.418.8800
 
www.piedmontreit.com




Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Quarterly Supplemental Information
Index

 
Page
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
Introduction
 
 
Other Investments
 
Corporate Data
 
Other Investments Detail
Investor Information
 
Supporting Information
 
Financial Highlights
 
Definitions
Key Performance Indicators
 
Research Coverage
Financials
 
 
Non-GAAP Reconciliations & Other Detail
Balance Sheet
 
Property Detail
Income Statements
 
Risks, Uncertainties and Limitations
Funds From Operations / Adjusted Funds From Operations
 
 
 
Same Store Analysis
 
 
 
Capitalization Analysis
 
 
 
Debt Summary
 
 
 
Debt Detail
 
 
 
Debt Analysis
 
 
 
Operational & Portfolio Information - Office Investments
 
 
 
 
Tenant Diversification
 
 
 
Tenant Credit Rating & Lease Distribution Information
 
 
 
Leased Percentage Information
 
 
 
Rental Rate Roll Up / Roll Down Analysis
 
 
 
Lease Expiration Schedule
 
 
 
Quarterly Lease Expirations
 
 
 
Annual Lease Expirations
 
 
 
Capital Expenditures & Commitments
 
 
 
Contractual Tenant Improvements & Leasing Commissions
 
 
 
Geographic Diversification
 
 
 
Geographic Diversification by Location Type
 
 
 
Industry Diversification
 
 
 
Property Investment Activity
 
 
 
Value-Add Activity
 
 
 



Notice to Readers:
Please refer to page 48 for a discussion of important risks related to the business of Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc., as well as an investment in its securities, including risks that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from results and events referred to in the forward-looking information. Considering these risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and limitations, the forward-looking statements about leasing, financial operations, leasing prospects, etc. contained in this quarterly supplemental information package might not occur.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation. In addition, many of the schedules herein contain rounding to the nearest thousands or millions and, therefore, the schedules may not total due to this rounding convention. When the Company sells properties, it restates historical income statements with the financial results of the sold assets presented in discontinued operations.




Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Corporate Data


Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (also referred to herein as "Piedmont" or the "Company") (NYSE: PDM) is a fully-integrated and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in the acquisition, ownership, management, development and disposition of primarily high-quality Class A office buildings located predominantly in large U.S. office markets and leased principally to high-credit-quality tenants. Approximately 83% of our Annualized Lease Revenue ("ALR")(1) is derived from our office properties located within the ten largest U.S. office markets, including Chicago, Washington, D.C., the New York metropolitan area, Boston and greater Los Angeles. Rated as an investment-grade company by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, Piedmont has maintained a low-leverage strategy while acquiring its properties.

This data supplements the information provided in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and should be reviewed in conjunction with such filings.
 
As of
 
As of
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Number of consolidated office properties (2)
75

 
74

Rentable square footage (in thousands) (2)
20,853

 
20,500

Percent leased (3)
86.0
%
 
87.5
%
Percent leased - stabilized portfolio (4)
88.9
%
 
90.5
%
Capitalization (in thousands):
 
 
 
Total debt - principal amount outstanding
$1,699,525
 
$1,416,525
Equity market capitalization
$3,282,410
 
$3,024,386
Total market capitalization
$4,981,935
 
$4,440,911
Total debt / Total market capitalization
34.1
%
 
31.9
%
Total debt / Total gross assets
30.8
%
 
27.2
%
Common stock data
 
 
 
High closing price during quarter
$19.97
 
$18.28
Low closing price during quarter
$18.10
 
$17.22
Closing price of common stock at period end
$19.59
 
$18.05
Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding (in thousands) (5)
167,810

 
170,441

Shares of common stock issued and outstanding (in thousands)
167,555

 
167,556

Rating / outlook
 
 
 
Standard & Poor's
BBB / Stable

 
BBB / Stable

Moody's
Baa2 / Stable

 
Baa2 / Stable

Employees
120

 
116



(1)
The definition for Annualized Lease Revenue can be found on page 39.
(2)
As of March 31, 2013, our consolidated office portfolio consisted of 75 properties (exclusive of our equity interests in five properties owned through unconsolidated joint ventures). During the first quarter of 2013, we sold 1111 Durham Avenue, a 237,000 square foot office building located in South Plainfield, NJ, and acquired Arlington Gateway, a 334,000 square foot office building located in Arlington, VA and 5 & 15 Wayside Road, a 271,000 square foot office building complex located in Burlington, MA. For additional detail on asset transactions during 2013, please refer to page 36.
(3)
Calculated as leased square footage plus square footage associated with executed new leases for currently vacant spaces divided by total rentable square footage, all as of the relevant date, expressed as a percentage. This measure is presented for our consolidated office properties and excludes unconsolidated joint venture properties. Please refer to page 26 for additional analyses regarding Piedmont's leased percentage.
(4)
Please refer to page 37 for information regarding value-add properties, data for which is removed from stabilized portfolio totals.
(5)
Weighted average fully diluted shares outstanding are presented on a year-to-date basis for each period.

3



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Investor Information

Corporate
11695 Johns Creek Parkway, Suite 350
Johns Creek, Georgia 30097
770.418.8800
www.piedmontreit.com


Executive Management
 
 
 
Donald A. Miller, CFA
Robert E. Bowers
Laura P. Moon
Chief Executive Officer, President
Chief Financial Officer, Executive
Chief Accounting Officer and
and Director
Vice President, and Treasurer
Senior Vice President
 
 
 
Raymond L. Owens
Carroll A. Reddic, IV
Robert K. Wiberg
Executive Vice President,
Executive Vice President,
Executive Vice President,
Capital Markets
Real Estate Operations and Assistant
Mid-Atlantic Region and
 
Secretary
Head of Development
 
 
 
Board of Directors
 
 
 
W. Wayne Woody
Frank C. McDowell
Donald A. Miller, CFA
Director, Chairman of the Board of
Director, Vice Chairman of the
Chief Executive Officer, President
Directors and Chairman of
Board of Directors and Chairman
and Director
Governance Committee
of Compensation Committee
 
 
 
 
Raymond G. Milnes, Jr.
Jeffery L. Swope
Michael R. Buchanan
Director and Chairman of
Director and Chairman of
Director
Audit Committee
Capital Committee
 
 
 
 
Wesley E. Cantrell
William H. Keogler, Jr.
Donald S. Moss
Director
Director
Director
 
 
 


Transfer Agent
Corporate Counsel
 
 
Computershare
King & Spalding
P.O. Box 358010
1180 Peachtree Street, NE
Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8010
Atlanta, GA 30309
Phone: 866.354.3485
Phone: 404.572.4600



4



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Financial Highlights
As of March 31, 2013


Financial Results (1) 

Funds from operations (FFO) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 was $60.2 million, or $0.36 per share (diluted), compared to $60.0 million, or $0.35 per share (diluted), for the same quarter in 2012. The increase in FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was principally related to the following factors: 1) increased operating income attributable to increased average occupancy for the same store properties during the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the first quarter of 2012, 2) operating income contributions from newly acquired properties, and 3) a $0.7 million reduction in general and administrative expenses during the first quarter of 2013 as compared to that of the first quarter of 2012 primarily attributable to lower legal fees, offset by 4) reduced operating income contributions attributable to sold properties in the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the first quarter of 2012, and 5) $1.2 million of acquisition costs in 2013 due to the purchase of two properties during the first quarter of 2013.

Core funds from operations (Core FFO) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 was $61.6 million, or $0.37 per share (diluted), compared to $60.0 million, or $0.35 per share (diluted), for the same quarter in 2012. The increase in Core FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was principally related to the items described above for changes in FFO, with the exception of the $1.2 million of acquisition costs associated with properties acquired during the first quarter of 2013, which were added back to Core FFO since they are expenses associated with specific capital transactions and considered to be non-recurring.

Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 was $36.6 million, or $0.22 per share (diluted), compared to $50.1 million, or $0.29 per share (diluted), for the same quarter in 2012. The decrease in AFFO for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily related to the items described above for changes in FFO, as well as increased non-incremental capital expenditures of $11.9 million and increased straight line rent adjustments of $2.5 million in 2013, both of which were attributable to the high volume of recent leasing activity.

Operations

On October 29, 2012, Hurricane Sandy made landfall in the metropolitan New York City area. As previously disclosed, most of the Company's properties in the New York area were only minimally damaged from the high winds and rain. Substantially all repair work related to the storm is complete, except for some equipment replacement at 60 Broad Street, which is anticipated to be completed during the second quarter of 2013. Expenses incurred in relation to the damage caused by the storm, as well as insurance reimbursements, have been presented on Piedmont's income statement in a separate line entitled Net Casualty Gain / (Loss). Due to the non-recurring nature of Hurricane Sandy-related expenses and insurance reimbursements, such items are excluded from the calculation of Core FFO and AFFO.

On a square footage leased basis, our total office portfolio was 86.0% leased as of March 31, 2013, as compared to 84.4% as of March 31, 2012 and 87.5% as of December 31, 2012. During the twelve-month period ending March 31, 2013, our same store stabilized leased percentage increased from 87.7% at March 31, 2012 to 88.5% at March 31, 2013. The same store stabilized leased percentage excludes the impact of acquisitions and dispositions completed during the last year, as well as value-add properties (see page 37). The primary reason for the increase in the leased percentage for our same store stabilized assets during that period is positive net absorption attributable to several recent large lease transactions for previously vacant spaces, most notably the 301,000 square foot Catamaran lease at Windy Point II in Schaumburg, IL and the 102,000 square foot Brother International lease at 200 Bridgewater Crossing in Bridgewater, NJ. Please refer to page 26 for additional leased percentage information.

The weighted average remaining lease term of our portfolio was 7.1 years(2) as of March 31, 2013 as compared to 6.9 years at December 31, 2012.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company completed 487,000 square feet of total leasing. Of the total leasing activity during the quarter, we signed renewal leases for 367,000 square feet and new tenant leases for 120,000 square feet. During the first quarter of 2013, we completed 479,000 square feet of leasing for our consolidated office properties. The average committed capital cost for all leases signed during the quarter at our consolidated office properties was $2.91 per square foot per year of lease term. Average committed capital cost per square foot per year of lease term for renewal leases signed during the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $2.38 and average committed capital cost per square foot per year of lease term for new leases signed during the same time period was $5.43 (see page 32).

(1)
FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are supplemental non-GAAP financial measures. See page 39 for definitions of non-GAAP financial measures. See pages 14 and 41 for reconciliations of FFO, Core FFO and AFFO to Net Income.
(2)
Remaining lease term (after taking into account leases for vacant spaces which had been executed but not commenced as of March 31, 2013) is weighted based on Annualized Lease Revenue, as defined on page 39.

5





During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we executed four leases greater than 20,000 square feet at our consolidated office properties. Please see information on those leases listed below.
Tenant
Property
Property Location
Square Feet Leased
 
Expiration Year
Lease Type
FedEx Corporate Services
350 Spectrum Loop
Colorado Springs, CO
155,808

 
2024
Renewal
Miller Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC
150 West Jefferson Avenue
Detroit, MI
69,974

 
2026
Renewal / Contraction
Lockheed Martin Corporation
400 Virginia Avenue
Washington, DC
52,227

 
2020
Renewal
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney
1901 Main Street
Irvine, CA
44,940

 
2024
Renewal / Expansion

Leasing Update

As of March 31, 2013, there were four tenants whose leases were in holdover or were scheduled to expire during the eighteen month period following the end of the first quarter of 2013 and contributed greater than 1% in net Annualized Lease Revenue (ALR) expiring during that period. Information regarding the leasing status of the spaces associated with those tenants' leases is presented below.
Tenant
Property
Property Location
Net Square Footage Expiring
Net Percentage of Current Quarter Annualized Lease Revenue Expiring(%)
Expiration (1)
Current Leasing Status
United States of America (National Park Service)
1201 Eye Street
Washington, D.C.
219,750

1.8%
Holdover
National Park Service is now in holdover status. The Company is in discussions with the National Park Service for a lease renewal.
BP
Aon Center
Chicago, IL
97,965

1.7%
Q4 2013
Approximately 91% of the square footage leased by BP has been leased on a long-term basis to: Aon Corporation, Thoughtworks, Integrys Energy Group, and Federal Home Loan Bank. Three of these future tenants are current subtenants. The remaining available space is actively being marketed for lease.
United States of America (Defense Intelligence Agency)
3100 Clarendon Boulevard
Arlington, VA
221,084

1.6%
Q4 2013
In December 2012, the Defense Intelligence Agency exercised a termination option pursuant to its lease. The lease will now expire December 31, 2013. The Company is actively marketing the space for lease.
Qwest Communications (also known as CenturyLink)
4250 North Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA
161,141

1.0%
Q2 2014
The Company is in discussions with the current tenant for a lease renewal and contraction.








(1)
The lease expiration date presented is that of the majority of the space leased to the tenant at the building.

6



Piedmont typically signs leases several months in advance of their anticipated lease commencement dates. Presented below is a schedule of uncommenced leases greater than 50,000 square feet and their anticipated commencement dates. Lease renewals are excluded from this schedule.
Tenant
Property
Property Location
Square Feet Leased
Space Status
Estimated Commencement Date
New / Expansion
Guidance Software, Inc.
1055 East Colorado Boulevard
Pasadena, CA
86,790
Vacant
Q3 2013
New
GE Capital
500 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL
79,162
Vacant
Q4 2013 - Q4 2014
Expansion
Aon Corporation
Aon Center
Chicago, IL
396,406
Not Vacant
Q4 2013
New
Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago
Aon Center
Chicago, IL
95,105
Not Vacant
Q4 2013
New
Thoughtworks, Inc.
Aon Center
Chicago, IL
52,529
Not Vacant
Q4 2013
New
Integrys Business Support, LLC
Aon Center
Chicago, IL
165,937
Not Vacant
Q2 2014
New
Piper Jaffray & Co.
US Bancorp Center
Minneapolis, MN
123,882
Not Vacant
Q2 2014
New
Catamaran, Inc.
Windy Point II
Schaumburg, IL
50,686
Vacant
Q2 2015
New

Occupancy versus NOI Analysis

Piedmont has been in a period of high lease rollover since 2010. This high lease rollover has resulted in a decrease in leased percentage and economic leased percentage over the past three years. This, in turn, has effected a lower Same Store NOI than might otherwise be anticipated given the overall leased percentage and the historical relationship between leased percentage and Same Store NOI. As of March 31, 2013, our overall leased percentage was 86.0% and our economic leased percentage was 76.4%. The difference between overall leased percentage and economic leased percentage is attributable to two factors:

1.
leases which have been contractually entered into for currently vacant space which have not commenced (amounting to approximately 384,000 square feet of leases as of March 31, 2013, or 1.8% of the office portfolio); and
2.
leases which have commenced but the tenants have not commenced paying full rent due to rental abatements (amounting to 2.0 million square feet of leases as of March 31, 2013, or a 7.8% impact to leased percentage on an economic basis). Please see the chart below for a listing of major contributors.

As the executed but not commenced leases begin and the rental abatement periods expire, there will be greater Same Store NOI growth than might otherwise be expected based on changes in overall leased percentage alone during that time period.


7



Due to the current economic environment, many new leases provide for rental abatement concessions to tenants. Those rental abatements typically occur at the beginning of a new lease's term. Since 2010, Piedmont has signed approximately 9.4 million square feet of leases within its consolidated office portfolio. Due to the large number of new leases in the Company's portfolio, abatements provided under those new leases have impacted the Company's current cash net operating income and AFFO. Presented below is a schedule of leases greater than 50,000 square feet that are currently under some form of rent abatement.
Tenant
Property
Property Location
Square Feet Leased
Abatement Structure
Abatement Expiration
HD Vest
Las Colinas Corporate Center I
Irving, TX
81,069
Base Rent
Q1 2013
BSH Home Appliances
1901 Main Street
Irvine, CA
52,625
Base Rent
Q1 2013
Miller Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC
150 West Jefferson Avenue
Detroit, MI
109,261
Base Rent
Q2 2013
KPMG
Aon Center
Chicago, IL
238,701
Gross Rent
Q3 2013
Brother International Corporation
200 Bridgewater Crossing
Bridgewater, NJ
101,724
Base Rent
Q3 2013
Catamaran, Inc.
Windy Point II
Schaumburg, IL
250,000
Gross Rent
Q4 2013
United HealthCare
Aon Center
Chicago, IL
55,059
Gross Rent
Q4 2013
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
1200 Enclave Parkway
Houston, TX
144,594
Base Rent (Partial)
Q1 2014
GE Capital
500 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL
291,935
Gross Rent
Q2 2014
General Electric Company
500 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL
53,972
Gross Rent
Q2 2014
DDB Needham Chicago
Aon Center
Chicago, IL
187,000
Base Rent ($4.00 per square foot)
Q2 2015

Financing and Capital Activity

As of March 31, 2013, our ratio of debt to total gross assets was 30.8%, our ratio of debt to gross real estate assets was 35.2%, and our ratio of debt to total market capitalization was 34.1%. These debt ratios are based on total principal amount outstanding for our various loans at March 31, 2013.
On March 4, 2013, Piedmont completed the purchase of Arlington Gateway, a twelve-story office building comprised of approximately 334,000 square feet in Arlington, VA. The purchase price was approximately $175.6 million, or $526 per square foot. The construction of the 99% leased building was completed in 2005. The property is both LEED certified and Energy Star rated. The building benefits from a rich amenity base, including close proximity to Metro. The acquisition allowed the Company to increase its concentration in the Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor submarket of Washington, D.C., as well as further its strategic objective of increasing ownership in its identified concentration markets.
On March 22, 2013, Piedmont completed the purchase of 5 & 15 Wayside Road, a multi-story project comprised of 271,000 square feet of office space in Burlington, MA. The purchase price was approximately $69.3 million, or $255 per square foot. The 95% leased, two-building project was constructed in 1999 and 2001. Well-located along Route 128 / Interstate 95, the project is easily accessed by commuters and affords tenants quick access to the area's deep retail amenity base. The acquisition allowed the Company to further its strategic objective of increasing ownership in its identified concentration markets.
On March 28, 2013, Piedmont completed the sale of 1111 Durham Avenue, a 237,000 square foot office building located in South Plainfield, NJ. The property, built in 1975, was sold for $4.0 million. Piedmont recorded an impairment loss on the asset of approximately $6.4 million when it was reclassified to held for sale. The subsequent sale allowed the Company to divest an outdated, non-core property, consistent with its long-term strategic objectives for location and building quality. The operating income for the asset is presented in discontinued operations.
On March 22, 2013, Piedmont entered into a binding contract to sell 1200 Enclave Parkway, a 150,000 square foot office building located in Houston, TX for $48.75 million, or $326 per square foot. The transaction closed on May 1, 2013. Piedmont will record a gain on the sale of the building during the second quarter of 2013. The Company purchased the property in March 2011 for $18.5 million under its value-add strategy. At the time, the property was 18% leased; the building is now 100% leased. The Company intends to deploy the value it created through the re-leasing of the property to full occupancy into other assets. During the first quarter of 2013, the property was reclassified from real estate assets held-for-use to real estate assets held-for-sale; the operating income for the asset is presented in discontinued operations.



8



In 2014, three of the Company's secured debt instruments will mature. The Company currently intends to issue unsecured bonds to repay most to all of the maturing debt. In anticipation of issuing unsecured bonds and considering the historically low interest rate environment, Piedmont has entered into a forward starting swap hedging program to partially protect the Company against rising interest rates and to lock a portion of the interest rate of the future bond issuance. Specifically, under this hedging program and through the hedge instruments, the Company will be effectively locking the treasury component of the all-in interest rate for its future ten-year tenored unsecured bond offering. As of the end of the first quarter, the Company had entered into two forward starting swaps with a blended rate of 2.23% and a notional amount of $140 million. Subsequent to quarter end, the Company has entered into two additional forward starting swaps, resulting in a notional amount of $280 million hedged under the program at a blended rate of 2.19%. At current swap spread levels, the Company effectively locked the treasury component for a 2014 bond issuance at approximately 2.02%. The Company may enter into additional forward starting swaps in advance of $575 million of secured debt maturing in early 2014.
On February 27, 2013, the Board of Directors of Piedmont declared dividends for the first quarter of 2013 in the amount of $0.20 per common share outstanding to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 11, 2013. The dividends were paid on March 22, 2013. The Company's dividend payout percentage for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was 54.4% of Core FFO and 91.6% of AFFO.
During the first quarter of 2013, the Company repurchased 600 shares of common stock under its share repurchase program. Since the stock repurchase program began in December 2011, the Company has repurchased a total of 5.5 million shares at an average price of $16.83 per share, or approximately $91.8 million in aggregate (before consideration of transaction costs). As of quarter end, Board-approved capacity remaining for additional repurchases totaled approximately $208 million under the stock repurchase plan.

Since 2007, the Company has been a defendant in two class action lawsuits alleging inadequate disclosures in 2007 in SEC filings related to its internalization, response to a tender offer, and amendments to the Company's charter. As previously disclosed, the Company reached tentative settlements with the plaintiffs in both cases totaling $7.5 million. During the first quarter of 2013, the court preliminarily approved the proposed settlements. The settlements were granted final approval by the court on April 18, 2013. The settlements are within available insurance limits and the Company is seeking recovery of these settlements from its insurance carriers. Please see Piedmont's Form 10-Q dated as of March 31, 2013 and its latest Form 10-K for further disclosure.

Subsequent Events

On May 2, 2013, the Board of Directors of Piedmont declared dividends for the second quarter of 2013 in the amount of $0.20 per common share outstanding to stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 31, 2013. The dividends are to be paid on June 21, 2013.

Guidance for 2013

The following financial guidance for calendar year 2013 remains unchanged and is based upon management's expectations at this time:
 
Low
 
High
Core Funds from Operations
$225 million
 
$243 million
Core Funds from Operations per diluted share
$1.35
 
$1.45

These estimates reflect management’s view of current market conditions and incorporate certain economic and operational assumptions and projections. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Note that individual quarters may fluctuate on both a cash and an accrual basis due to the timing of lease commencements and expirations, repairs and maintenance, capital expenditures, capital markets activities and one-time revenue or expense events. In addition, the Company’s guidance is based on information available to management as of the date of this supplemental report.


9



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Key Performance Indicators
Unaudited (in thousands except for per share data)

This section of our supplemental report includes non-GAAP financial measures, including, but not limited to, Core Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (Core EBITDA), Funds from Operations (FFO), Core Funds from Operations (Core FFO), and Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO). Definitions of these non-GAAP measures are provided on page 39 and reconciliations are provided beginning on page 41.

 
Three Months Ended

3/31/2013
 
12/31/2012
 
9/30/2012
 
6/30/2012
 
3/31/2012
Selected Operating Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Percent leased (1)
86.0
%
 
87.5
%
 
87.0
%
 
85.0
%
 
84.4
%
Percent leased - stabilized portfolio (1) (2)
88.9
%
 
90.5
%
 
90.1
%
 
88.1
%
 
87.5
%
Rental income
$108,021
 
$105,570
 
$105,463
 
$104,153
 
$103,875
Total revenues
$134,304
 
$133,511
 
$133,279
 
$131,652
 
$131,086
Total operating expenses
$95,978
 
$98,970
 
$99,302
 
$95,948
 
$96,414
Real estate operating income
$38,326
 
$34,541
 
$33,977
 
$35,704
 
$34,672
Core EBITDA
$78,039
 
$76,472
 
$79,168
 
$76,411
 
$76,677
Core FFO
$61,564
 
$60,068
 
$62,721
 
$60,356
 
$60,043
Core FFO per share - diluted
$0.37
 
$0.36
 
$0.37
 
$0.35
 
$0.35
AFFO
$36,589
 
$31,275
 
$20,351
 
$36,216
 
$50,113
AFFO per share - diluted
$0.22
 
$0.19
 
$0.12
 
$0.21
 
$0.29
Gross dividends
$33,511
 
$33,549
 
$33,675
 
$34,418
 
$34,526
Dividends per share
$0.200
 
$0.200
 
$0.200
 
$0.200
 
$0.200
Selected Balance Sheet Data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total real estate assets
$3,850,989
 
$3,612,732
 
$3,612,550
 
$3,638,101
 
$3,657,677
Total gross real estate assets
$4,822,455
 
$4,564,629
 
$4,550,183
 
$4,558,128
 
$4,590,545
Total assets
$4,538,661
 
$4,254,875
 
$4,285,831
 
$4,328,308
 
$4,326,698
Net debt (3)
$1,681,267
 
$1,403,234
 
$1,392,261
 
$1,325,610
 
$1,298,738
Total liabilities
$1,916,041
 
$1,614,380
 
$1,620,551
 
$1,601,568
 
$1,550,040
Ratios
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core EBITDA margin (4)
57.6
%
 
56.2
%
 
58.5
%
 
57.0
%
 
57.1
%
Fixed charge coverage ratio (5)
4.8 x

 
4.7 x

 
4.9 x

 
4.8 x

 
4.6 x

Net debt to Core EBITDA (6)
5.2 x

 
4.6 x

 
4.4 x

 
4.3 x

 
4.2 x

(1)
Please refer to page 26 for additional leased percentage information.
(2)
Please refer to page 37 for additional information on value-add properties, data for which is removed from stabilized portfolio totals.
(3)
Net debt is calculated as the total principal amount of debt outstanding minus cash and cash equivalents and escrow deposits and restricted cash. The increase in net debt is primarily attributable to capital expenditures and stock repurchases completed in 2012, as well as the acquisition of two properties during the first quarter of 2013.
(4)
Core EBITDA margin is calculated as Core EBITDA divided by total revenues (including revenues associated with discontinued operations).
(5)
The fixed charge coverage ratio is calculated as Core EBITDA divided by the sum of interest expense, principal amortization, capitalized interest and preferred dividends. The Company had no capitalized interest, principal amortization or preferred dividends during any of the periods presented.
(6)
Core EBITDA is annualized for the purposes of this calculation. During the first quarter of 2013, we acquired two properties in the last month of the quarter; the borrowings to complete the acquisitions are reflected in the numerator and full quarter contributions to EBITDA by the properties acquired have been included on a pro forma basis in the denominator as if the properties had been owned as of the beginning of the quarter. If the actual, partial quarter EBITDA contributions by the properties acquired were to be reflected, the net debt to Core EBITDA ratio would be 5.4 x.

10



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Unaudited (in thousands)

 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
September 30, 2012
 
June 30, 2012
 
March 31, 2012
Assets:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate, at cost:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land assets
$
666,479

 
$
626,076

 
$
624,352

 
$
626,016

 
$
628,285

Buildings and improvements
3,962,295

 
3,770,799

 
3,739,800

 
3,735,700

 
3,735,643

Buildings and improvements, accumulated depreciation
(902,978
)
 
(883,008
)
 
(857,260
)
 
(836,751
)
 
(813,272
)
Intangible lease asset
138,085

 
122,685

 
138,538

 
149,365

 
191,421

Intangible lease asset, accumulated amortization
(67,333
)
 
(67,940
)
 
(79,471
)
 
(82,601
)
 
(119,076
)
Construction in progress
29,487

 
20,373

 
22,808

 
23,430

 
16,551

Real estate assets held for sale, gross
26,109

 
24,696

 
24,685

 
23,617

 
18,645

Real estate assets held for sale, accumulated depreciation & amortization
(1,155
)
 
(949
)
 
(902
)
 
(675
)
 
(520
)
Total real estate assets
3,850,989

 
3,612,732

 
3,612,550

 
3,638,101

 
3,657,677

Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures
37,835

 
37,226

 
37,369

 
37,580

 
37,901

Cash and cash equivalents
17,575

 
12,957

 
20,763

 
26,869

 
28,679

Tenant receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
29,237

 
25,038

 
24,768

 
22,884

 
24,933

Straight line rent receivable
124,460

 
120,110

 
114,962

 
110,860

 
106,373

Notes receivable

 

 
19,000

 
19,000

 
19,000

Due from unconsolidated joint ventures
458

 
463

 
533

 
569

 
449

Escrow deposits and restricted cash
683

 
334

 
23,001

 
48,046

 
25,108

Prepaid expenses and other assets
12,724

 
13,022

 
13,552

 
7,385

 
12,477

Interest rate swap
1,712

 
1,075

 

 

 

Goodwill
180,097

 
180,097

 
180,097

 
180,097

 
180,097

Deferred financing costs, less accumulated amortization
5,908

 
6,454

 
7,022

 
4,597

 
5,187

Deferred lease costs, less accumulated amortization
271,337

 
240,140

 
227,907

 
229,148

 
226,112

Other assets held for sale
5,646

 
5,227

 
4,307

 
3,172

 
2,705

Total assets
$
4,538,661

 
$
4,254,875

 
$
4,285,831

 
$
4,328,308

 
$
4,326,698

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Line of credit and notes payable
$
1,699,525

 
$
1,416,525

 
$
1,436,025

 
$
1,400,525

 
$
1,352,525

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and accrued capital expenditures
139,273

 
127,263

 
109,125

 
126,207

 
116,292

Deferred income
23,585

 
21,552

 
24,110

 
23,668

 
32,031

Intangible lease liabilities, less accumulated amortization
45,215

 
40,805

 
42,375

 
44,246

 
46,640

Interest rate swaps
8,443

 
8,235

 
8,916

 
6,922

 
2,552

Notes Payable and other liabilities held for sale

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities
1,916,041

 
1,614,380

 
1,620,551

 
1,601,568

 
1,550,040

Stockholders' equity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock
1,676

 
1,676

 
1,680

 
1,702

 
1,726

Additional paid in capital
3,667,614

 
3,667,051

 
3,665,870

 
3,665,284

 
3,664,202

Cumulative distributions in excess of earnings
(1,041,552
)
 
(1,022,681
)
 
(994,967
)
 
(934,933
)
 
(888,331
)
Other comprehensive loss
(6,731
)
 
(7,160
)
 
(8,916
)
 
(6,922
)
 
(2,552
)
Piedmont stockholders' equity
2,621,007

 
2,638,886

 
2,663,667

 
2,725,131

 
2,775,045

Non-controlling interest
1,613

 
1,609

 
1,613

 
1,609

 
1,613

Total stockholders' equity
2,622,620

 
2,640,495

 
2,665,280

 
2,726,740

 
2,776,658

Total liabilities, redeemable common stock and stockholders' equity
$
4,538,661

 
$
4,254,875

 
$
4,285,831

 
$
4,328,308

 
$
4,326,698

Common stock outstanding at end of period
167,555

 
167,556

 
168,044

 
170,235

 
172,630


11



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Unaudited (in thousands except for per share data)

 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
3/31/2013
 
12/31/2012
 
9/30/2012
 
6/30/2012
 
3/31/2012
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
 
$
108,021

 
$
105,570

 
$
105,463

 
$
104,153

 
$
103,875

Tenant reimbursements
 
25,652

 
26,630

 
27,221

 
26,785

 
26,513

Property management fee revenue
 
631

 
599

 
520

 
626

 
574

Other rental income
 

 
712

 
75

 
88

 
124

 
 
134,304

 
133,511

 
133,279

 
131,652

 
131,086

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating costs
 
52,892

 
54,225

 
50,567

 
52,538

 
51,691

Depreciation
 
29,420

 
29,104

 
28,062

 
27,230

 
26,852

Amortization
 
9,117

 
10,505

 
15,165

 
11,316

 
12,614

General and administrative
 
4,549

 
5,136

 
5,508

 
4,864

 
5,257

 
 
95,978

 
98,970

 
99,302

 
95,948

 
96,414

Real estate operating income
 
38,326

 
34,541

 
33,977

 
35,704

 
34,672

Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
(16,373
)
 
(16,296
)
 
(16,247
)
 
(15,943
)
 
(16,537
)
Interest and other income (expense)
 
(1,277
)
 
68

 
383

 
285

 
97

Litigation settlement expense (1)
 

 

 
(7,500
)
 

 

Net casualty gain / (loss) (2)
 
(161
)
 
(5,170
)
 

 

 

Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
 
395

 
185

 
323

 
246

 
170

 
 
(17,416
)
 
(21,213
)
 
(23,041
)
 
(15,412
)
 
(16,270
)
Income from continuing operations
 
20,910

 
13,328

 
10,936

 
20,292

 
18,402

Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income, excluding impairment loss
 
147

 
1,120

 
153

 
412

 
999

Impairment loss
 
(6,402
)
 

 

 

 

Gain / (loss) on sale of properties
 

 
(6
)
 
(254
)
 
10,008

 
17,830

Income / (loss) from discontinued operations (3)
 
(6,255
)
 
1,114

 
(101
)
 
10,420

 
18,829

Net income
 
14,655

 
14,442

 
10,835

 
30,712

 
37,231

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
(4
)
 
(4
)
 
(4
)
 
(4
)
 
(4
)
Net income attributable to Piedmont
 
$
14,651

 
$
14,438

 
$
10,831

 
$
30,708

 
$
37,227

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
 
167,810

 
167,951

 
168,929

 
172,209

 
172,874

Net income per share available to common stockholders - diluted
 
$
0.09

 
$
0.09

 
$
0.06

 
$
0.18

 
$
0.22

(1)
Costs incurred to settle litigation described on page 9.
(2)
Expenses related to damage caused by Hurricane Sandy net of insurance recoveries received.
(3)
Reflects operating results for Deschutes, Rhein, Rogue, Willamette, and Portland Land Parcels in Beaverton, OR, which were all sold on March 19, 2012; 26200 Enterprise Way in Lake Forest, CA, which was sold on May 31, 2012; 110 and 112 Hidden Lake Circle in Duncan, SC, which were sold on September 21, 2012; 1111 Durham Avenue in South Plainfield, NJ, which was sold on March 28, 2013; and 1200 Enclave Parkway in Houston, TX, which is to be sold in May 2013.

12



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Unaudited (in thousands except for per share data)

 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013
3/31/2012
 
Change ($)
Change (%)
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
108,021

$
103,875

 
$
4,146

4.0
 %
Tenant reimbursements
25,652

26,513

 
(861
)
(3.2
)%
Property management fee revenue
631

574

 
57

9.9
 %
Other rental income

124

 
(124
)
(100.0
)%
 
134,304

131,086

 
3,218

2.5
 %
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating costs
52,892

51,691

 
(1,201
)
(2.3
)%
Depreciation
29,420

26,852

 
(2,568
)
(9.6
)%
Amortization
9,117

12,614

 
3,497

27.7
 %
General and administrative
4,549

5,257

 
708

13.5
 %
 
95,978

96,414

 
436

0.5
 %
Real estate operating income
38,326

34,672

 
3,654

10.5
 %
Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
(16,373
)
(16,537
)
 
164

1.0
 %
Interest and other income (expense)
(1,277
)
97

 
(1,374
)
(1,416.5
)%
Litigation settlement expense (1)


 

 %
Net casualty gain / (loss) (2)
(161
)

 
(161
)
 %
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
395

170

 
225

132.4
 %
 
(17,416
)
(16,270
)
 
(1,146
)
(7.0
)%
Income from continuing operations
20,910

18,402

 
2,508

13.6
 %
Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income, excluding impairment loss
147

999

 
(852
)
(85.3
)%
Impairment loss
(6,402
)

 
(6,402
)
 %
Gain / (loss) on sale of properties

17,830

 
(17,830
)
(100.0
)%
Income / (loss) from discontinued operations (3)
(6,255
)
18,829

 
(25,084
)
(133.2
)%
Net income
14,655

37,231

 
(22,576
)
(60.6
)%
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
(4
)
(4
)
 

 %
Net income attributable to Piedmont
$
14,651

$
37,227

 
$
(22,576
)
(60.6
)%
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
167,810

172,874

 
 
 
Net income per share available to common stockholders - diluted
$
0.09

$
0.22

 
 
 
(1)
Costs incurred to settle litigation described on page 9.
(2)
Expenses related to damage caused by Hurricane Sandy net of insurance recoveries received.
(3)
Reflects operating results for Deschutes, Rhein, Rogue, Willamette, and Portland Land Parcels in Beaverton, OR, which were all sold on March 19, 2012; 26200 Enterprise Way in Lake Forest, CA, which was sold on May 31, 2012; 110 and 112 Hidden Lake Circle in Duncan, SC, which were sold on September 21, 2012; 1111 Durham Avenue in South Plainfield, NJ, which was sold on March 28, 2013; and 1200 Enclave Parkway in Houston, TX, which is to be sold in May 2013.

13



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Funds From Operations, Core Funds From Operations and Adjusted Funds From Operations
Unaudited (in thousands except for per share data)


 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
3/31/2013
 
3/31/2012
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Piedmont
 
$
14,651

 
$
37,227

Depreciation (1) (2)
 
29,886

 
27,809

Amortization (1)
 
9,220

 
12,840

(Gain) / loss on sale of properties (1)
 

 
(17,830
)
Impairment loss (1)
 
6,402

 

Funds from operations
 
60,159

 
60,046

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
Acquisition costs
 
1,244

 
(3
)
Net casualty (gain) / loss
 
161

 

Core funds from operations
 
61,564

 
60,043

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
Deferred financing cost amortization (1)
 
594

 
803

Depreciation of non real estate assets
 
98

 
93

Straight-line effects of lease revenue (1)
 
(4,032
)
 
(1,565
)
Stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense
 
594

 
334

Amortization of lease-related intangibles (1)
 
(1,065
)
 
(1,532
)
Acquisition costs
 
(1,244
)
 
3

Non-incremental capital expenditures (3)
 
(19,920
)
 
(8,066
)
Adjusted funds from operations
 
$
36,589

 
$
50,113

 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
 
167,810

 
172,874

 
 
 
 
 
Funds from operations per share (diluted)
 
$
0.36

 
$
0.35

Core funds from operations per share (diluted)
 
$
0.37

 
$
0.35

Adjusted funds from operations per share (diluted)
 
$
0.22

 
$
0.29


(1)
Includes adjustments for consolidated properties, including discontinued operations, and for our proportionate share of amounts attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures.
(2)
Excludes depreciation of non real estate assets.
(3)
Non-incremental capital expenditures are defined on page 39.

14



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Same Store Net Operating Income (Cash Basis)
Unaudited (in thousands)

 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013

 
 
3/31/2012

 
Net income attributable to Piedmont
$
14,651

 
 
$
37,227

 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
4

 
 
4

 
Interest expense (1)
16,373

 
 
16,537

 
Depreciation (1)
29,984

 
 
27,902

 
Amortization (1)
9,220

 
 
12,840

 
Acquisition costs
1,244

 
 
(3
)
 
Impairment loss (1)
6,402

 
 

 
Net casualty (gain) / loss
161

 
 

 
(Gain) / loss on sale of properties (1)

 
 
(17,830
)
 
Core EBITDA
78,039

 
 
76,677

 
General & administrative expenses (1)
4,609

 
 
5,318

 
Management fee revenue
(631
)
 
 
(574
)
 
Interest and other income (1)
21

 
 
(94
)
 
Lease termination income

 
 
(123
)
 
Lease termination expense - straight line rent & acquisition intangibles write-offs
25

 
 
99

 
Straight-line effects of lease revenue (1)
(4,057
)
 
 
(1,664
)
 
Net effect of amortization of above/(below) market in-place lease intangibles (1)
(1,065
)
 
 
(1,532
)
 
Property net operating income - cash basis
76,941

 
 
78,107

 
Net operating income from:
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisitions (2)
(836
)
 
 

 
Dispositions (3)
166

 
 
(1,928
)
 
Unconsolidated joint ventures
(744
)
 
 
(590
)
 
Same store net operating income - cash basis
$
75,527

 
 
$
75,589

 
Change period over period
(0.1
)%
 
 
N/A

 

Same Store Net Operating Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Seven Markets
Three Months Ended
 
 
3/31/2013
 
3/31/2012
 
 
$
%
 
$
%
 
Washington, D.C. (4)
$
18,505

24.5

 
$
19,040

25.2

 
New York
12,083

16.0

 
12,019

15.9

 
Chicago (5)
8,594

11.4

(6) 
11,174

14.8

(6 
) 
Minneapolis (7)
5,653

7.5

 
4,990

6.6

 
Dallas
3,630

4.8

 
3,803

5.0

 
Los Angeles
3,347

4.4

 
3,176

4.2

 
Boston (8)
4,721

6.3

 
3,890

5.2

 
Other (9)
18,994

25.1

 
17,497

23.1

 
Total
$
75,527

100.0

 
$
75,589

100.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

15



(1)
Includes amounts attributable to consolidated properties, including discontinued operations, and our proportionate share of amounts attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures.
(2)
Acquisitions consist of Gavitello Land in Atlanta, GA, purchased on June 28, 2012; Glenridge Highlands III Land in Atlanta, GA, purchased on October 15, 2012; Arlington Gateway in Arlington, VA, purchased on March 4, 2013; and 5 & 15 Wayside Road in Burlington, MA, purchased on March 22, 2013.
(3)
Dispositions consist of Deschutes, Rhein, Rogue, Willamette, and Portland Land Parcels in Beaverton, OR, sold on March 19, 2012; 26200 Enterprise Way in Lake Forest, CA, sold on May 31, 2012; 110 and 112 Hidden Lake Circle in Duncan, SC, sold on September 21, 2012; and 1111 Durham Avenue in South Plainfield, NJ, sold on March 28, 2013.
(4)
The decrease in Washington, D.C. Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily attributable to the expiration of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency lease at One Independence Square in Washington D.C., offset somewhat by increased rental revenue as a result of the expirations of the rental abatement periods for several leases at Piedmont Pointe I & II in Bethesda, MD.
(5)
The decrease in Chicago Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily related to gross rental abatements associated with several new leases, most notably that of GE Capital, at 500 West Monroe Street in Chicago, IL, as well as a prior year operating expense recovery true-up with a former tenant that occurred in 2012 and did not recur in 2013 at Windy Point II in Schaumburg, IL.
(6)
The percentage contribution from Chicago to our total Same Store Net Operating Income is smaller than our geographic concentration percentage in Chicago, which is presented on an ALR basis (see page 33), primarily because of the large number of leases with gross rent abatements and a number of leases yet to commence for currently vacant space (the projected gross rent for which is included in our ALR calculation). As the gross rent abatements burn off and as executed but not commenced leases begin, the Same Store Net Operating Income percentage contribution from Chicago should increase and should be more closely aligned with our Chicago concentration percentage as presented on page 33.
(7)
The increase in Minneapolis Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily related to the expirations of the rental abatement periods associated with several new leases at US Bancorp Center in Minneapolis, MN and Crescent Ridge II in Minnetonka, MN.
(8)
The increase in Boston Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily related to the expiration of the rental abatement period for the State Street Bank lease at 1200 Crown Colony Drive in Quincy, MA, as well as a property tax recovery true-up that occurred in 2013 at One Brattle Square in Cambridge, MA.
(9)
The increase in Other Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily related to the expirations of rental abatement periods associated with new leases with Grand Canyon Education at Desert Canyon 300 in Phoenix, AZ and Chrysler Group, LLC at 1075 West Entrance Drive in Auburn Hills, MI.


16



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Same Store Net Operating Income (Accrual Basis)
Unaudited (in thousands)

 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013

 
 
3/31/2012

 
Net income attributable to Piedmont
$
14,651

 
 
$
37,227

 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
4

 
 
4

 
Interest expense (1)
16,373

 
 
16,537

 
Depreciation (1)
29,984

 
 
27,902

 
Amortization (1)
9,220

 
 
12,840

 
Acquisition costs
1,244

 
 
(3
)
 
Impairment loss (1)
6,402

 
 

 
Net casualty (gain) / loss
161

 
 

 
(Gain) / loss on sale of properties (1)

 
 
(17,830
)
 
Core EBITDA
78,039

 
 
76,677

 
General & administrative expenses (1)
4,609

 
 
5,318

 
Management fee revenue
(631
)
 
 
(574
)
 
Interest and other income (1)
21

 
 
(94
)
 
Lease termination income

 
 
(123
)
 
Lease termination expense - straight line rent & acquisition intangibles write-offs
25

 
 
99

 
Property net operating income - accrual basis
82,063

 
 
81,303

 
Net operating income from:
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisitions (2)
(887
)
 
 

 
Dispositions (3)
166

 
 
(1,813
)
 
Unconsolidated joint ventures
(796
)
 
 
(564
)
 
Same store net operating income - accrual basis
$
80,546

 
 
$
78,926

 
Change period over period
2.1
%
 
 
N/A

 

Same Store Net Operating Income
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Seven Markets
Three Months Ended
 
 
3/31/2013
 
3/31/2012
 
 
$
%
 
$
%
 
Washington, D.C. (4)
$
18,805

23.4

 
$
20,448

25.9

 
New York (5)
13,306

16.5

 
12,415

15.7

 
Chicago (6)
12,082

15.0

(7) 
10,906

13.8

(7 
) 
Minneapolis (8)
5,987

7.4

 
5,333

6.8

 
Dallas
3,749

4.7

 
3,924

5.0

 
Los Angeles
3,323

4.1

 
3,335

4.2

 
Boston
5,005

6.2

 
4,718

6.0

 
Other
18,289

22.7

 
17,847

22.6

 
Total
$
80,546

100.0

 
$
78,926

100.0

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


17



(1)
Includes amounts attributable to consolidated properties, including discontinued operations, and our proportionate share of amounts attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures.
(2)
Acquisitions consist of Gavitello Land in Atlanta, GA, purchased on June 28, 2012; Glenridge Highlands III Land in Atlanta, GA, purchased on October 15, 2012; Arlington Gateway in Arlington, VA, purchased on March 4, 2013; and 5 & 15 Wayside Road in Burlington, MA, purchased on March 22, 2013.
(3)
Dispositions consist of Deschutes, Rhein, Rogue, Willamette, and Portland Land Parcels in Beaverton, OR, sold on March 19, 2012; 26200 Enterprise Way in Lake Forest, CA, sold on May 31, 2012; 110 and 112 Hidden Lake Circle in Duncan, SC, sold on September 21, 2012; and 1111 Durham Avenue in South Plainfield, NJ, sold on March 28, 2013.
(4)
The decrease in Washington, D.C. Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily attributable to the expiration of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency lease at One Independence Square in Washington D.C., as well as a prior year property tax recovery true-up that occurred in 2012 and did not recur in 2013 at Two Independence Square in Washington, D.C. The decrease in Washington, D.C. Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was offset somewhat by increased rental revenue as a result of the commencement of several new leases at Piedmont Pointe II in Bethesda, MD.
(5)
The increase in New York Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily related to one-time expense recovery adjustments at 60 Broad Street in New York, NY which are not expected to recur.
(6)
The increase in Chicago Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily related to an increase in rental revenue at Aon Center in Chicago, IL due to the commencement of a 239,000 square foot lease with KPMG and a 55,000 square foot lease with United HealthCare in the second half of 2012.
(7)
The percentage contribution from Chicago to our total Same Store Net Operating Income is smaller than our geographic concentration percentage in Chicago, which is presented on an ALR basis (see page 33), primarily because of the large number of leases with operating expense recovery abatements (which abatements are not included in straight line rent adjustments) and a number of leases yet to commence for currently vacant space (the projected gross rent for which is included in our ALR calculation). As operating expense recovery abatements burn off and as executed but not commenced leases begin, the Same Store Net Operating Income percentage contribution from Chicago should increase and should be more closely aligned with our Chicago concentration percentage as presented on page 33.
(8)
The increase in Minneapolis Same Store Net Operating Income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 was primarily related to the early renewal of the US Bancorp lease as well as the expiration of the operating expense recovery abatement periods associated with several new leases at US Bancorp Center in Minneapolis, MN.



18



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Capitalization Analysis
Unaudited (in thousands except for per share data)


 
 
As of
 
As of
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock price (1)
 
$
19.59

 
$
18.05

Total shares outstanding
 
167,555

 
167,556

Equity market capitalization (1)
 
$
3,282,410

 
$
3,024,386

Total debt - principal amount outstanding
 
$
1,699,525

 
$
1,416,525

Total market capitalization (1)
 
$
4,981,935

 
$
4,440,911

Total debt / Total market capitalization
 
34.1
%
 
31.9
%
Total gross real estate assets
 
$
4,822,455

 
$
4,564,629

Total debt / Total gross real estate assets (2)
 
35.2
%
 
31.0
%
Total debt / Total gross assets (3)
 
30.8
%
 
27.2
%










(1)
Reflects common stock closing price as of the end of the reporting period.
(2)
Gross real estate assets is defined as total real estate assets with the add back of accumulated depreciation and accumulated amortization related to real estate assets.
(3)
Gross assets is defined as total assets with the add back of accumulated depreciation and accumulated amortization related to real estate assets.

19



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Debt Summary
As of March 31, 2013
Unaudited ($ in thousands)

Floating Rate & Fixed Rate Debt
Debt (1)
Principal Amount Outstanding
Weighted Average Stated Interest Rate
Weighted Average Maturity
 
 
 
 
 
Floating Rate
$412,000
(2) 
1.39%
52.7 months
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed Rate
1,287,525

 
4.59%
29.3 months
 
 
 
 
 
Total
$1,699,525
 
3.81%
35.0 months
                    

 
Unsecured & Secured Debt
Debt (1)
Principal Amount Outstanding
Weighted Average Stated Interest Rate
Weighted Average Maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured
$712,000
 
1.93%
(3) 
49.0 months
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured
987,525

 
5.17%
 
24.9 months
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
$1,699,525
 
3.81%
 
35.0 months

 
Debt Maturities
Maturity Year
Secured Debt - Principal Amount Outstanding (1)
Unsecured Debt - Principal Amount Outstanding (1)
 Weighted Average
Stated Interest
Rate
 Percentage of Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
2013
$—
$—
 
N/A
—%
2014
575,000
 
4.89%
33.8%
2015
105,000
 
5.29%
6.2%
2016
167,525
300,000
 
3.71%
27.5%
2017
140,000
412,000
(4) 
2.49%
32.5%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
$987,525
$712,000
 
3.81%
100.0%

(1)
All of Piedmont's outstanding debt as of March 31, 2013 was interest-only debt.
(2)
Amount represents the outstanding balance as of March 31, 2013, on the $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The $300 million unsecured term loan has a stated variable rate; however, Piedmont entered into interest rate swap agreements which effectively fix the interest rate on this loan at 2.69% through its maturity date of November 22, 2016, assuming no credit rating change for the Company. This unsecured term loan, therefore, is reflected as fixed rate debt.
(3)
The weighted average interest rate is a weighted average rate for amounts outstanding under our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility and our $300 million unsecured term loan.
(4)
The initial maturity date of the $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility is August 19, 2016; however, there are two, six-month extension options available under the facility providing for a final extended maturity date of August 21, 2017. For the purposes of this schedule, we reflect the maturity date of the facility as the final extended maturity date of August 2017.

20



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Debt Detail
Unaudited ($ in thousands)

Facility
Property
Rate (1)
Maturity
Principal Amount Outstanding as of March 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured
 
 
 
 
 
$200.0 Million Fixed-Rate Loan
Aon Center
4.87
%
 
5/1/2014
$200,000
$25.0 Million Fixed-Rate Loan
Aon Center
5.70
%
 
5/1/2014
25,000
$350.0 Million Secured Pooled Facility
Nine Property Collateralized Pool (2)
4.84
%
 
6/7/2014
350,000
$105.0 Million Fixed-Rate Loan
US Bancorp Center
5.29
%
 
5/11/2015
105,000
$125.0 Million Fixed-Rate Loan
Four Property Collateralized Pool (3)
5.50
%
 
4/1/2016
125,000
$42.5 Million Fixed-Rate Loan
Las Colinas Corporate Center I & II
5.70
%
 
10/11/2016
42,525
$140.0 Million WDC Fixed-Rate Loans
1201 & 1225 Eye Street
5.76
%
 
11/1/2017
140,000
Subtotal / Weighted Average (4)
 
5.17
%
 

$987,525
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unsecured
 
 
 
 
 
$500.0 Million Unsecured Facility (5)
N/A
1.39
%
(6) 
8/21/2017
$412,000
$300.0 Million Unsecured Term Loan
N/A
2.69
%
(7) 
11/22/2016
300,000
Subtotal / Weighted Average (4)
 
1.93
%
 
 
$712,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Debt - Principal Amount Outstanding / Weighted Average Stated Rate (4)
3.81
%
 

$1,699,525











(1)
All of Piedmont’s outstanding debt as of March 31, 2013, was interest-only debt.
(2)
The nine property collateralized pool includes 1200 Crown Colony Drive, Braker Pointe III, 2 Gatehall Drive, One and Two Independence Square, 2120 West End Avenue, 200 and 400 Bridgewater Crossing, and Fairway Center II.
(3)
The four property collateralized pool includes 1430 Enclave Parkway, Windy Point I and II, and 1055 East Colorado Boulevard.
(4)
Weighted average is based on the total balance outstanding and interest rate at March 31, 2013.
(5)
All of Piedmont’s outstanding debt as of March 31, 2013, was term debt with the exception of $412 million outstanding on our unsecured revolving credit facility. The $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility has an initial maturity date of August 19, 2016; however, there are two, six-month extension options available under the facility providing for a total extension of up to one year to August 21, 2017. The final extended maturity date is presented on this schedule.
(6)
The interest rate presented for the $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility is the weighted average interest rate for all outstanding draws as of March 31, 2013. Piedmont may select from multiple interest rate options with each draw under this facility, including the prime rate and various length LIBOR locks. All LIBOR selections are subject to an additional spread (1.175% as of March 31, 2013) over the selected rate based on Piedmont’s current credit rating.
(7)
The $300 million unsecured term loan has a stated variable rate; however, Piedmont entered into interest rate swap agreements which effectively fix the interest rate on this loan at 2.69% through its maturity date of November 22, 2016, assuming no credit rating change for the Company.

21



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Debt Analysis
As of March 31, 2013
Unaudited



Debt Covenant Compliance (1)
Required
Actual



Maximum Leverage Ratio
0.60
0.32
Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (2)
1.50
4.50
Maximum Secured Indebtedness Ratio
0.40
0.18
Minimum Unencumbered Leverage Ratio
1.60
4.52
Minimum Unencumbered Interest Coverage Ratio (3)
1.75
14.52




Three Months Ended
 
Year Ended
Other Debt Coverage Ratios
March 31, 2013
 
December 31, 2012

 
 
 
Net debt to core EBITDA (4)
5.2 x
 
4.5 x
Fixed charge coverage ratio (5)
4.8 x
 
4.7 x
Interest coverage ratio (6)
4.8 x
 
4.7 x











(1)
Debt covenant compliance calculations relate to specific calculations detailed in our credit agreements.
(2)
Defined as EBITDA for the trailing four quarters (including the Company's share of EBITDA from unconsolidated interests), less one-time or non-recurring gains or losses, less a $0.15 per square foot capital reserve, and excluding the impact of straight line rent leveling adjustments and amortization of intangibles divided by the Company's share of fixed charges, as more particularly described in the credit agreements. This definition of fixed charge coverage ratio as prescribed by our credit agreements is different from the fixed charge coverage ratio definition employed elsewhere within this report.
(3)
Defined as net operating income for the trailing four quarters for unencumbered assets (including the Company's share of net operating income from partially-owned entities and subsidiaries that are deemed to be unencumbered) less a $0.15 per square foot capital reserve divided by the Company's share of interest expense associated with unsecured financings only, as more particularly described in the credit agreements.
(4)
During the first quarter of 2013, we acquired two properties in the last month of the quarter; the borrowings to complete the acquisitions are reflected in the numerator and full quarter contributions to EBITDA by the properties acquired have been included on a pro forma basis in the denominator as if the properties had been owned as of the beginning of the quarter. If the actual, partial quarter EBITDA contributions by the properties acquired were to be reflected, the net debt to Core EBITDA ratio would be 5.4 x.
(5)
Fixed charge coverage is calculated as Core EBITDA divided by the sum of interest expense, principal amortization, capitalized interest and preferred dividends. The Company had no capitalized interest, principal amortization or preferred dividends during the periods ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(6)
Interest coverage ratio is calculated as Core EBITDA divided by the sum of interest expense and capitalized interest. The Company had no capitalized interest during the periods ended March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

22



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Tenant Diversification (1) 
As of March 31, 2013
(in thousands except for number of properties)

Tenant
Credit Rating (2)
Number of Properties
Lease Expiration (3)
Annualized Lease Revenue
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
 Leased Square Footage
Percentage of Leased Square Footage (%)
U.S. Government
AA+ / Aaa
9

(4)
$53,572
9.6
1,252
7.0
BP (5)
A / A2
1
2013
 
32,710
5.9
776
4.3
US Bancorp
A+ / A1
3
2024
(6)
28,227
5.1
973
5.4
State of New York
AA / Aa2
1
2019
 
20,003
3.6
481
2.7
GE
AA+ / Aa3
2
2027
 
14,828
2.7
453
2.5
Nestle
AA / Aa2
1
2015
 
14,581
2.6
392
2.2
Independence Blue Cross
No rating available
1
2023
 
13,924
2.5
761
4.2
Shaw
BBB+ / Ba2
1
2018
 
10,014
1.8
313
1.7
Nokia
BB- / Ba3
2
2020
 
9,992
1.8
386
2.2
Lockheed Martin
A- / Baa1
3
2019
(7)
9,700
1.8
283
1.6
City of New York
AA / Aa2
1
2020
 
9,544
1.7
313
1.7
KPMG
No rating available
2
2027
 
8,863
1.6
279
1.6
Gallagher
No rating available
1
2018
 
8,167
1.5
307
1.7
DDB Needham
BBB+ / Baa1
1
2018
 
7,624
1.4
213
1.2
Gemini
A+ / A2
1
2021
 
7,349
1.3
205
1.1
Caterpillar Financial
A / A2
1
2022
 
7,305
1.3
312
1.7
Harvard University
AAA / Aaa
2
2017
 
6,693
1.2
105
0.6
KeyBank
A- / A3
2
2016
 
6,433
1.2
210
1.2
Edelman
No rating available
1
2024
 
6,359
1.1
183
1.0
Raytheon
A- / A3
2
2019
 
6,290
1.1
440
2.5
Harcourt
BBB+
1
2016
 
6,202
1.1
195
1.1
Catamaran
BB / Ba2
1
2025
 
5,975
1.1
301
1.7
Jones Lang LaSalle
BBB- / Baa2
1
2017
 
5,936
1.1
165
0.9
First Data Corporation
B / B3
1
2020
 
5,894
1.1
195
1.1
Qwest Communications
BB / Ba1
1
2014
 
5,795
1.0
161
0.9
Archon Group
A- / A3
2
2018
 
5,612
1.0
235
1.3
Other


Various
 
238,007
42.8
8,054
44.9
Total



 
$555,599
100.0
17,943
100.0


23



Tenant Diversification
March 31, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2012


            








(1)
This schedule presents all tenants contributing 1.0% or more to Annualized Lease Revenue.
(2)
Credit rating may reflect the credit rating of the parent or a guarantor. When available, both the Standard & Poor's credit rating and the Moody's credit rating are provided.
(3)
Unless otherwise indicated, Lease Expiration represents the expiration year of the majority of the square footage leased by the tenant.
(4)
There are several leases with several different agencies of the U.S. Government with expiration years ranging from 2013 to 2027.
(5)
The majority of the space is subleased to Aon Corporation. Approximately 91% of the space currently leased by BP has been re-leased under long-term leases for the period following the BP lease expiration.
(6)
US Bank's lease at One & Two Meridian Crossings, representing approximately 337,000 square feet and $9.3 million of Annualized Lease Revenue, expires in 2023. Of the space leased at US Bancorp Center, US Bancorp renewed on 395,000 square feet, representing $10.9 million of Annualized Lease Revenue, through 2024 and Piper Jaffray, a current subtenant, leased 124,000 square feet, representing $3.7 million of Annualized Lease Revenue, through 2025. Approximately 120,000 square feet and $4.3 million of Annualized Lease Revenue will expire in 2014.
(7)
There are three leases with Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin's lease at: A) 9221 Corporate Boulevard, representing $3.4 million of Annualized Lease Revenue and 115,000 square feet, expires in 2019, B) 9211 Corporate Boulevard, representing $3.3 million of Annualized Lease Revenue and 115,000 square feet, expires in 2014, and C) 400 Virginia Avenue, representing $3.0 million of Annualized Lease Revenue and 52,000 square feet, expires in 2020.

24



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Tenant Credit Rating & Lease Distribution Information
As of March 31, 2013


Tenant Credit Rating (1) 
 
 
 
 
 
Annualized Lease Revenue (in thousands)
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
 
 
 
 
 
AAA / Aaa
$60,274
10.9
 
AA / Aa
79,348

14.3
 
A / A
143,732

25.9
 
BBB / Baa
55,571

10.0
 
BB / Ba
31,354

5.6
 
B / B
19,051

3.4
 
Below
618

0.1
 
Not rated (2)
165,651

29.8
 
Total
$555,599
100.0
 
 
 
 
 



Lease Distribution
 
Number of Leases
Percentage of Leases (%)
 Annualized Lease Revenue (in thousands)
 Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
 Leased Square Footage (in thousands)
Percentage of Leased Square Footage (%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2,500 or Less
205
35.8
$17,140
3.1
176

1.0
 
2,501 - 10,000
150
26.2
28,261

5.1
831

4.6
 
10,001 - 20,000
67
11.7
28,953

5.2
961

5.4
 
20,001 - 40,000
62
10.9
57,336

10.3
1,835

10.2
 
40,001 - 100,000
37
6.5
68,305

12.3
2,131

11.9
 
Greater than 100,000
51
8.9
355,604

64.0
12,009

66.9
 
Total
572
100.0
$555,599
100.0
17,943

100.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





(1)
Credit rating may reflect the credit rating of the parent or a guarantor. Where differences exist between the Standard & Poor's credit rating for a tenant and the Moody's credit rating for a tenant, the higher credit rating is selected for this analysis.
(2)
The classification of a tenant as "not rated" does not indicate that the tenant is of poor credit quality, but can indicate that the tenant or the tenant's debt, if any, has not been rated. Included in this category are such tenants as Independence Blue Cross, McKinsey & Company and KPMG.

25



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Leased Percentage Information
(in thousands)

Impact of Strategic Transactions on Leased Percentage

The Company’s stated long-term growth strategy includes the recycling of capital from certain stabilized or non-core assets into office properties located in focused concentration and opportunistic markets. Some of the recently acquired properties are value-add properties which are defined as low-occupancy properties acquired at attractive bases with earnings growth and value appreciation potential achievable through leasing up such assets to a stabilized occupancy. Because the value-add properties have large vacancies, they negatively affect Piedmont’s overall leased percentage. In order to identify the effect they have on Piedmont’s overall leased percentage, the following information is being provided. The analysis below: 1) removes the impact of the value-add properties from Piedmont’s overall office portfolio total under the heading “Stabilized Portfolio Analysis”; 2) provides a year-over-year comparison of leased percentage on the same subset of properties under the heading “Same Store Analysis”; and 3) provides a year-over-year comparison of leased percentage on the same subset of stabilized properties under the heading "Same Store Stabilized Analysis".
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
March 31, 2012
 
 
 
 Leased Square Footage
 Rentable Square Footage
Percent Leased (1)
 
 Leased Square Footage
 Rentable Square Footage
Percent Leased (1)
 
 
As of December 31, 20xx
17,935

20,500

87.5
%
 
18,124

20,942

86.5
%
 
 
New leases
517



 
621



 
 
Expired leases
(943
)


 
(1,010
)


 
 
Other
1

(4
)

 
(7
)



 
 
Subtotal
17,510

20,496

85.4
%
 
17,728

20,942

84.7
%
 
 
Acquisitions during period
578

594


 



 
 
Dispositions during period
(145
)
(237
)

 
(325
)
(325
)

 
 
As of March 31, 20xx (2) (3)
17,943

20,853

86.0
%
 
17,403

20,617

84.4
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Twelve Months Ended
 
Twelve Months Ended
 
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stabilized Portfolio Analysis
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less value-add properties (4)
(689
)
(1,436
)
48.0
%
 
(752
)
(1,582
)
47.5
%
 
 
Stabilized Total (2) (3)
17,254

19,417

88.9
%
 
16,651

19,035

87.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same Store Analysis
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less acquisitions / dispositions after March 31, 2012 (4) (5)
(578
)
(594
)
97.3
%
 
(290
)
(382
)
75.9
%
 
 
Same Store Total (2) (3) (6)
17,365

20,259

85.7
%
 
17,113

20,235

84.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Same Store Stabilized Analysis
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less value-add same store properties (4)
(839
)
(1,586
)
52.9
%
 
(752
)
(1,582
)
47.5
%
 
 
Same Store Stabilized Total (2) (3)
16,526

18,673

88.5
%
 
16,361

18,653

87.7
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Calculated as leased square footage as of period end with the addition of square footage associated with uncommenced leases for spaces vacant as of period end, divided by total rentable square footage as of period end, expressed as a percentage.
(2)
The square footage associated with leases with end of period expiration dates is included in the end of the period leased square footage.
(3)
End of period leased square footage for 2013 includes short-term space leased on behalf of NASA in accordance with requirements stipulated under its lease to allow it to restructure its space at Two Independence Square in Washington, D.C. As of March 31, 2013, the total short-term space amounts to approximately 63,000 square feet and it will be occupied until an estimated date of July 31, 2014.
(4)
For additional information on acquisitions and dispositions completed during the last year and value-add properties, please refer to pages 36 and 37, respectively.
(5)
Dispositions completed during the previous twelve months are deducted from the previous period data and acquisitions completed during the previous twelve months are deducted from the current period data.
(6)
Excluding executed but not commenced leases for currently vacant spaces, comprising approximately 384,000 square feet for the current period and 684,000 square feet for the prior period, Piedmont's same store commenced leased percentage was 83.8% and 81.2% for the current and prior periods, respectively.


26



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Rental Rate Roll Up / Roll Down Analysis (1) 
(in thousands)


 
Three Months Ended
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
 
Square Feet
% of Total Signed During Period
% of Rentable Square Footage
% Change Cash Rents (2)
% Change Accrual Rents  (3) (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leases executed for spaces vacant one year or less
377
78.5%
1.8%
(18.7)%
(8.6)%
(5) 
Leases executed for spaces excluded from analysis (6)
102
21.5%



 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 














(1)
The population analyzed consists of consolidated office leases executed during the period with lease terms greater than one year. Retail leases, as well as leases associated with storage spaces, management offices, and unconsolidated joint venture assets, were excluded from this analysis.
(2)
For the purposes of this analysis, the cash rents last in effect for the previous leases were compared to the initial cash rents of the new leases in order to calculate the percentage change.
(3)
For the purposes of this analysis, the accrual basis rents for the previous leases were compared to the accrual basis rents of the new leases in order to calculate the percentage change. For newly signed leases which have variations in accrual basis rents, whether because of known future expansions, contractions, lease expense recovery structure changes, or other similar reasons, the weighted average of such accrual basis rents is used for the purposes of this analysis.
(4)
For leases under which a tenant may use, at its discretion, a portion of its tenant improvement allowance for expenses other than those related to improvements to its space, an assumption is made that the tenant elects to use any such portion of its tenant improvement allowance for improvements to its space prior to the commencement of its lease, unless the Company is notified otherwise by the tenant. This assumption is made based upon the historical tenant improvement allowance usage patterns of the Company's tenants.
(5)
Each of the three largest lease renewals were lease restructurings, which rolled down rents but also had lower associated capital expenditure requirements. The net effect of these transactions was a low capital commitment per square foot per year of lease term for the quarter, offset by a larger decrease in rents. The three largest lease renewals were: the FedEx Corporate Services lease at 350 Spectrum Loop in Colorado Springs, CO, the Lockheed Martin lease at 400 Virginia Avenue in Washington, D.C., and the Miller Canfield lease at 150 West Jefferson Avenue in Detroit, MI.
(6)
Represents leases signed at our consolidated office assets that do not qualify for inclusion in the analysis primarily because the spaces for which the new leases were signed had been vacant for greater than one year.

27



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Lease Expiration Schedule
As of March 31, 2013
(in thousands)

 
 
OFFICE PORTFOLIO
 
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
 
 
Annualized Lease Revenue (1)
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
 Rentable Square Footage
 Percentage of Rentable Square Footage (%)
 
Annualized Lease Revenue (1)
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
Percentage of Current Year Total Annualized Lease Revenue Expiring (%)
Vacant
 
$—
2,910
14.0
 
$—
N/A
2013 (2)
 
49,838
9.0
1,163
5.6
 
19,828
3.6
39.8
2014
 
32,855
5.9
984
4.7
 
3,571
0.6
10.9
2015
 
37,006
6.6
1,459
7.0
 
2016
 
28,231
5.1
904
4.3
 
1,442
0.3
5.1
2017
 
53,632
9.6
1,337
6.4
 
1,857
0.3
3.5
2018
 
48,689
8.8
1,688
8.1
 
2019
 
52,332
9.4
1,974
9.5
 
20,003
3.6
38.2
2020
 
34,426
6.2
1,261
6.1
 
9,544
1.7
27.7
2021
 
14,844
2.7
510
2.4
 
2022
 
24,538
4.4
796
3.8
 
2023
 
38,209
6.9
1,639
7.9
 
2024
 
43,781
7.9
1,482
7.1
 
2025
 
14,791
2.7
636
3.0
 
2026
 
6,765
1.2
271
1.3
 
Thereafter
 
75,662
13.6
1,839
8.8
 
27,232
4.9
36.0
Total / Weighted Average
 
$555,599
100.0
20,853
100.0
 
$83,477
15.0
 

(1)
Annualized rental income associated with newly executed leases for currently occupied space is incorporated herein only at the expiration date for the current lease. Annualized rental income associated with such new leases is removed from the expiry year of the current lease and added to the expiry year of the new lease. These adjustments effectively incorporate known roll ups and roll downs into the expiration schedule.
(2)
Leases and other revenue-producing agreements on a month-to-month basis, aggregating 8,327 square feet and Annualized Lease Revenue of $330,861, are assigned a lease expiration date of a year and a day beyond the period end date. Includes leases with an expiration date of March 31, 2013 aggregating 21,115 square feet and Annualized Lease Revenue of $705,996, as well as the National Park Service lease, which is comprised of 219,750 square feet and $10.0 million in Annualized Lease Revenue, or 1.8% of the Company's total Annualized Lease Revenue.

28



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Lease Expirations by Quarter
As of March 31, 2013
(in thousands)

 
 
Q2 2013 (1)
 
Q3 2013
 
Q4 2013
 
Q1 2014
 
 
Expiring Square Footage
Expiring Lease Revenue (2)
 
Expiring Square Footage
Expiring Lease Revenue (2)
 
Expiring Square Footage
Expiring Lease Revenue (2)
 
Expiring Square Footage
Expiring Lease Revenue (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Atlanta
 
8
$282
 
11
$264
 
$57
 
28
$613
Austin
 
 
 
 
Boston
 
 
 
 
Central & South Florida
 
 
14
361
 
8
228
 
1
31
Chicago
 
30
849
 
23
1,282
 
112
4,325
 
3
Cleveland
 
 
 
10
208
 
Dallas
 
4
109
 
 
98
2,257
 
2
Denver
 
 
 
 
Detroit
 
 
53
 
34
755
 
1
3
Houston
 
 
 
 
Los Angeles
 
37
1,170
 
5
149
 
3
150
 
Minneapolis
 
22
739
 
13
434
 
 
2
59
Nashville
 
 
 
 
New York
 
6
259
 
 
27
1,383
 
37
1,209
Philadelphia
 
 
 
 
Phoenix
 
 
 
 
Washington, D.C. (3)
 
243
11,112
 
34
1,399
 
368
15,231
 
115
3,344
Total / Weighted Average (4)
 
350
$14,520
 
153
$3,889
 
660
$24,594
 
184
$5,264











(1)
Includes leases with an expiration date of March 31, 2013 aggregating 21,115 square feet and expiring lease revenue of $698,200. No such adjustments are made to other periods presented.
(2)
Expiring lease revenue is calculated as expiring square footage multiplied by the gross rent per square foot of the tenant currently leasing the space.
(3)
Approximately 220,000 square feet and $10.0 million of expiring lease revenue in the second quarter of 2013 is related to the lease with the National Park Service, which is currently in holdover status.
(4)
Total expiring lease revenue in any given year will not tie to the expiring Annualized Lease Revenue presented on the Lease Expiration Schedule on the previous page as the Lease Expiration Schedule accounts for the revenue effects of newly signed leases. Reflected herein are expiring revenues based on in-place rental rates.

29



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Lease Expirations by Year
As of March 31, 2013
(in thousands)

 
12/31/2013 (1)
 
12/31/2014
 
12/31/2015
 
12/31/2016
 
12/31/2017
 
Expiring Square Footage
Expiring Lease Revenue (2)
 
Expiring Square Footage
Expiring Lease Revenue (2)
 
Expiring Square Footage
Expiring Lease Revenue (2)
 
Expiring Square Footage
Expiring Lease Revenue (2)
 
Expiring Square Footage
Expiring Lease Revenue (2)
Atlanta
19
$603
 
29
$644
 
29
$535
 
18
$361
 
18
$481
Austin
 
 
 
195
6,208
 
Boston
 
1
113
 
135
2,796
 
3
190
 
106
5,989
Central & South Florida
22
589
 
1
35
 
21
482
 
65
1,654
 
141
3,393
Chicago
165
6,456
 
33
894
 
188
5,339
 
84
2,420
 
295
15,932
Cleveland
10
208
 
 
 
13
296
 
14
333
Dallas
102
2,366
 
13
304
 
173
4,095
 
20
474
 
196
4,741
Denver
 
 
 
 
Detroit
86
755
 
8
166
 
62
419
 
31
693
 
78
1,493
Houston
 
 
 
17
 
6
Los Angeles
45
1,470
 
5
1,068
 
437
15,966
 
88
2,683
 
43
1,510
Minneapolis
35
1,173
 
293
8,402
 
103
3,726
 
33
1,065
 
39
1,251
Nashville
 
 
 
 
New York
34
1,642
 
96
4,087
 
77
2,410
 
281
9,083
 
69
2,158
Philadelphia
 
 
 
 
Phoenix
 
 
132
1,934
 
 
Washington, D.C. (3)
645
27,741
 
505
16,537
 
102
4,506
 
73
3,085
 
338
16,383
Total / Weighted Average (4)
1,163
$43,003
 
984
$32,250
 
1,459
$42,208
 
904
$28,229
 
1,337
$53,670












(1)
Includes leases with an expiration date of March 31, 2013 aggregating 21,115 square feet and expiring lease revenue of $698,200. No such adjustments are made to other periods presented.
(2)
Expiring lease revenue is calculated as expiring square footage multiplied by the gross rent per square foot of the tenant currently leasing the space.
(3)
Approximately 220,000 square feet and $10.0 million of expiring lease revenue in 2013 is related to the lease with the National Park Service, which is currently in holdover status.
(4)
Total expiring lease revenue in any given year will not tie to the expiring Annualized Lease Revenue presented on the Lease Expiration Schedule on page 28 as the Lease Expiration Schedule accounts for the revenue effects of newly signed leases. Reflected herein are expiring revenues based on in-place rental rates.

30



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Capital Expenditures & Commitments
For the quarter ended March 31, 2013
Unaudited (in thousands)

 
For the Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013
 
12/31/2012
 
9/30/2012
 
6/30/2012
 
3/31/2012
Non-incremental
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Building / construction / development
$
930

 
$
1,994

 
$
5,257

 
$
1,959

 
$
1,426

Tenant improvements
13,744

 
20,944

 
17,347

 
4,809

 
5,367

Leasing costs
5,246

 
289

 
15,979

 
11,013

 
1,273

Total non-incremental
19,920

 
23,227

 
38,583

 
17,781

 
8,066

Incremental
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Building / construction / development
6,712

 
5,680

 
7,338

 
5,721

 
2,241

Tenant improvements
14,068

 
5,731

 
5,904

 
12,044

 
5,938

Leasing costs
1,642

 
3,315

 
8,768

 
1,687

 
1,925

Total incremental
22,422

 
14,726

 
22,010

 
19,452

 
10,104

Total capital expenditures
$
42,342

 
$
37,953

 
$
60,593

 
$
37,233

 
$
18,170


 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-incremental tenant improvement commitments (1)
 
 
 
 
Non-incremental tenant improvement commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2012
 
$111,850
 
 
New non-incremental tenant improvement commitments related to leases executed during period
 
6,250

 
 
Non-incremental tenant improvement expenditures
(13,744
)
 
 
 
Less: Tenant improvement expenditures fulfilled through accrued liabilities already presented on Piedmont's balance sheet, expired commitments or other adjustments
(5,841
)
 
 
 
Non-incremental tenant improvement commitments fulfilled, expired or other adjustments
 
(19,585
)
 
 
Total as of March 31, 2013
 
$98,515
 
 
 
 
 
 











NOTE:
The information presented on this page is for all consolidated assets, inclusive of our industrial properties.
(1)
Commitments are unexpired contractual non-incremental tenant improvement obligations for leases executed in current and prior periods that have not yet been incurred and have not otherwise been presented on Piedmont's financial statements. The four largest commitments total approximately $63.0 million, or 64% of the total outstanding commitments.

31



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Contractual Tenant Improvements and Leasing Commissions

 
 
 For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
For the Year Ended
 
 
2012
2011
2010
Renewal Leases
 
 
 
 
 
Number of leases
15
45
48
37
 
Square feet 
367,248
1,150,934
2,280,329
1,241,481
 
Tenant improvements per square foot (1)
$13.47
$19.12
$33.29
$14.40
 
Leasing commissions per square foot
$8.38
$6.64
$9.97
$8.40
 
Total per square foot
$21.85
$25.76
$43.26
$22.80
 
Tenant improvements per square foot per year of lease term
$1.47
$2.90
$3.93
$1.74
 
Leasing commissions per square foot per year of lease term
$0.91
$1.01
$1.18
$1.02
 
Total per square foot per year of lease term (2)
$2.38
$3.91
$5.11
$2.76
New Leases (3)




 
Number of leases
22
92
76
56
 
Square feet
112,021
1,765,510
1,588,271
866,212
 
Tenant improvements per square foot (1)
$25.01
$47.64
$41.21
$32.65
 
Leasing commissions per square foot
$9.18
$18.49
$15.38
$11.28
 
Total per square foot
$34.19
$66.13
$56.59
$43.93
 
Tenant improvements per square foot per year of lease term
$3.97
$4.30
$4.19
$4.16
 
Leasing commissions per square foot per year of lease term
$1.46
$1.67
$1.57
$1.44
 
Total per square foot per year of lease term
$5.43
$5.97
$5.76
$5.60
Total
 




 
Number of leases
37
137
124
93
 
Square feet
479,269
2,916,444
3,868,600
2,107,693
 
Tenant improvements per square foot (1)
$16.17
$36.39
$36.54
$21.90
 
Leasing commissions per square foot
$8.57
$13.81
$12.19
$9.59
 
Total per square foot
$24.74
$50.20
$48.73
$31.49
 
Tenant improvements per square foot per year of lease term
$1.90
$3.91
$4.05
$2.70
 
Leasing commissions per square foot per year of lease term
$1.01
$1.48
$1.35
$1.18
 
Total per square foot per year of lease term
$2.91
$5.39
$5.40
$3.88

NOTE: This information is presented for our consolidated office assets only and excludes activity associated with storage spaces.
(1)
For leases under which a tenant may use, at its discretion, a portion of its tenant improvement allowance for expenses other than those related to improvements to its space, an assumption is made that the tenant elects to use any such portion of its tenant improvement allowance for improvements to its space prior to the commencement of its lease, unless the Company is notified otherwise by the tenant. This assumption is made based upon the historical tenant improvement allowance usage patterns of the Company's tenants.
(2)
During 2011, we completed two large, 15-year lease renewals with significant capital commitments: NASA at Two Independence Square in Washington, D.C. and GE at 500 West Monroe Street in Chicago, IL. If the costs associated with these renewals were to be removed from the average committed capital cost calculation, the average committed capital cost per square foot per year of lease term for renewal leases in 2011 would be $2.80. During 2012, we completed one large, long-term lease renewal with an above-average capital commitment with US Bancorp at US Bancorp Center in Minneapolis, MN. If the costs associated with this renewal were to be removed from the average committed capital cost calculation, the average committed capital cost per square foot per year of lease term for renewal leases in 2012 would be $2.73.
(3)
Since 2010, Piedmont has selectively employed a value-add strategy for new property acquisitions. Piedmont defines value-add properties as those acquired with low occupancies at attractive bases with earnings growth and value appreciation potential achievable through leasing up such assets to stabilized occupancies. Because the value-add properties have large vacancies, many of which have not previously been leased (first generation spaces), the leasing of those vacancies negatively affects Piedmont’s contractual tenant improvements on a per foot and a per foot per year basis for new leases.

32



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Geographic Diversification
As of March 31, 2013
($ and square footage in thousands)


Location
Number of Properties
 Annualized Lease Revenue
 Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
 Rentable Square Footage
Percentage of Rentable Square Footage (%)
 Leased Square Footage
Percent Leased (%)
Chicago
6
$129,980
23.4
4,780
22.9
3,762
78.7
Washington, D.C.
15
116,119
20.9
3,379
16.2
2,786
82.5
New York
6
78,714
14.2
2,422
11.6
2,357
97.3
Minneapolis
4
44,447
8.0
1,613
7.7
1,480
91.8
Boston
7
33,478
6.0
1,294
6.2
1,276
98.6
Los Angeles
4
29,791
5.4
999
4.8
870
87.1
Dallas
7
25,649
4.6
1,279
6.1
1,164
91.0
Detroit
4
17,685
3.2
930
4.5
800
86.0
Atlanta
6
16,309
2.9
1,062
5.1
649
61.1
Houston
2
14,624
2.6
463
2.2
463
100.0
Philadelphia
1
13,924
2.5
761
3.7
761
100.0
Phoenix
4
9,211
1.7
564
2.7
477
84.6
Central & South Florida
4
8,386
1.5
476
2.3
360
75.6
Nashville
1
7,305
1.3
312
1.5
312
100.0
Austin
1
6,207
1.1
195
0.9
195
100.0
Denver
1
2,204
0.4
156
0.8
156
100.0
Cleveland
2
1,566
0.3
168
0.8
75
44.6
Total / Weighted Average
75
$555,599
100.0
20,853
100.0
17,943
86.0


33



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Geographic Diversification by Location Type
As of March 31, 2013
(square footage in thousands)


 
 
 
CBD / URBAN INFILL
 
SUBURBAN
 
TOTAL
Location
State
 
Number of Properties
 Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
 Rentable Square Footage
Percentage of Rentable Square Footage (%)
 
Number of Properties
 Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
 Rentable Square Footage
Percentage of Rentable Square Footage (%)
 
Number of Properties
 Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
 Rentable Square Footage
Percentage of Rentable Square Footage (%)
Chicago
IL
 
2
19.0
3,654
17.5
 
4
4.4
1,126
5.4
 
6
23.4
4,780
22.9
Washington, D.C.
DC, VA, MD
 
10
18.6
2,898
13.9
 
5
2.3
481
2.3
 
15
20.9
3,379
16.2
New York
NY, NJ
 
1
7.2
1,027
4.9
 
5
7.0
1,395
6.7
 
6
14.2
2,422
11.6
Minneapolis
MN
 
1
5.1
928
4.5
 
3
2.9
685
3.2
 
4
8.0
1,613
7.7
Boston
MA
 
2
2.2
173
0.8
 
5
3.8
1,121
5.4
 
7
6.0
1,294
6.2
Los Angeles
CA
 
3
4.7
865
4.1
 
1
0.7
134
0.7
 
4
5.4
999
4.8
Dallas
TX
 
 
7
4.6
1,279
6.1
 
7
4.6
1,279
6.1
Detroit
MI
 
1
1.8
493
2.4
 
3
1.4
437
2.1
 
4
3.2
930
4.5
Atlanta
GA
 
2
2.0
578
2.8
 
4
0.9
484
2.3
 
6
2.9
1,062
5.1
Houston
TX
 
 
2
2.6
463
2.2
 
2
2.6
463
2.2
Philadelphia
PA
 
1
2.5
761
3.7
 
 
1
2.5
761
3.7
Phoenix
AZ
 
 
4
1.7
564
2.7
 
4
1.7
564
2.7
Central & South Florida
FL
 
 
4
1.5
476
2.3
 
4
1.5
476
2.3
Nashville
TN
 
1
1.3
312
1.5
 
 
1
1.3
312
1.5
Austin
TX
 
 
1
1.1
195
0.9
 
1
1.1
195
0.9
Denver
CO
 
 
1
0.4
156
0.8
 
1
0.4
156
0.8
Cleveland
OH
 
 
2
0.3
168
0.8
 
2
0.3
168
0.8
Total / Weighted Average
 
24
64.4
11,689
56.1
 
51
35.6
9,164
43.9
 
75
100.0
20,853
100.0


34



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Industry Diversification
As of March 31, 2013
($ and square footage in thousands)

Industry
Number of Tenants
Percentage of Total Tenants (%)
Annualized Lease Revenue
Percentage of Annualized Lease Revenue (%)
 Leased Square Footage
Percentage of Leased Square Footage (%)
Governmental Entity
6
1.7
$83,477
15.0
2,056
11.4
Depository Institutions
16
4.6
51,908
9.3
1,780
9.9
Business Services
64
18.4
43,756
7.9
1,525
8.5
Engineering, Accounting, Research, Management & Related Services
37
10.7
41,458
7.5
1,188
6.6
Petroleum Refining & Related Industries
23
6.6
32,710
5.9
776
4.3
Nondepository Credit Institutions
15
4.3
32,014
5.8
1,126
6.3
Insurance Carriers
1
0.3
28,761
5.2
1,271
7.1
Communications
31
8.9
18,589
3.3
623
3.5
Security & Commodity Brokers, Dealers, Exchanges & Services
9
2.6
17,602
3.2
638
3.6
Insurance Agents, Brokers & Services
29
8.4
17,066
3.1
719
4.0
Electronic & Other Electrical Equipment & Components, Except Computer
9
2.6
16,122
2.9
606
3.4
Educational Services
9
2.6
15,433
2.8
406
2.3
Food & Kindred Products
4
1.2
14,803
2.7
399
2.2
Transportation Equipment
4
1.2
14,226
2.5
518
2.9
Automotive Repair, Services & Parking
6
1.7
13,669
2.4
49
0.3
Other
84
24.2
114,005
20.5
4,263
23.7
Total
347
100.0
$555,599
100.0
17,943
100.0

35



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Property Investment Activity
As of March 31, 2013
($ and square footage in thousands)


Acquisitions Over Previous Eighteen Months
Property
 
Location
Acquisition Date
Percent Ownership (%)
Year Built
Purchase Price
 Rentable Square Footage
 Percent Leased at Acquisition (%)
400 TownPark
 
Lake Mary, FL
11/10/2011
100
2008
$23,865
176
19
Gavitello Land
 
Atlanta, GA
6/28/2012
100
N/A
2,500
N/A
N/A
Glenridge Highlands III Land
 
Atlanta, GA
10/15/2012
100
N/A
1,725
N/A
N/A
Arlington Gateway
(1) 
Arlington, VA
3/4/2013
100
2005
175,552
334
99
5 & 15 Wayside Road
 
Burlington, MA
3/22/2013
100
1999 / 2001
69,321
271
95

 







 
 
 
 
 
 
$272,963
781
80

Dispositions Over Previous Eighteen Months
Property
 
Location
Disposition Date
Percent Ownership (%)
Year Built
Sale Price
 Rentable Square Footage
 Percent Leased at Disposition (%)
35 West Wacker Drive
(2) 
Chicago, IL
12/15/2011
96.5
1989
$401,000
1,118
100
Willamette
Beaverton, OR
3/19/2012
100
1988
7,050
73
100
Rogue
Beaverton, OR
3/19/2012
100
1998
13,550
105
100
Deschutes
(3) 
Beaverton, OR
3/19/2012
100
1989
7,150
73
100
Rhein
Beaverton, OR
3/19/2012
100
1990
10,250
74
100
Portland Land Parcels
Beaverton, OR
3/19/2012
100
N/A
5,942
N/A
N/A
26200 Enterprise Way
Lake Forest, CA
5/31/2012
100
2000
28,250
145
100
110 Hidden Lake Circle
Duncan, SC
9/21/2012
100
1987
16,058
474
100
112 Hidden Lake Circle
Duncan, SC
9/21/2012
100
1987
9,842
313
100
1111 Durham Avenue
 
South Plainfield, NJ
3/28/2013
100
1975
4,000
237

 







 
 
 
 
 
 
$503,092
2,612
91








(1)
The property consists of approximately 334,000 square feet; however, due to the square footages referenced in several leases, the rentable square footage is currently 323,000 square feet. As the existing leases expire, the affected spaces will be re-leased to the correct square footages.
(2)
Sale price and rentable square footage are gross figures and have not been adjusted for Piedmont's ownership percentage.
(3)
Piedmont exercised a landlord termination option for one full floor immediately prior to the sale of the property to Nike, Inc. After the effectiveness of the termination, the leased percentage became 50%.

36



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Value-Add Activity
As of March 31, 2013
($ and square footage in thousands)

Presented below are properties that were acquired employing a value-add strategy. Once a property acquired under a value-add strategy reaches 80% leased, it is deemed stabilized for the purposes of supplemental reporting and will be removed from the value-add classification.

Value-Add Properties
Property
 
Location
Acquisition Date
Percent Ownership (%)
Year Built
Purchase Price
 Rentable Square Footage
 Current Percent Leased (%)
 Percent Leased at Acquisition (%)
 Real Estate Gross Book Value
 Estimated Cost to Stabilize (per VACANT square foot)
Suwanee Gateway One
Suwanee, GA
9/28/2010
100
2008
$7,875
142
$7,953
$40 - 60
500 West Monroe Street
(1)
Chicago, IL
3/31/2011
100
1991
227,500
966
60
49
208,206
$60 - 90
The Medici
(2)
Atlanta, GA
6/7/2011
100
2008
13,210
152
32
12
14,405
$35 - 60
400 TownPark
Lake Mary, FL
11/10/2011
100
2008
23,865
176
34
19
23,705
$35 - 50
 
 
 
 
 
 
$272,450
1,436
48
36
$254,269



Properties Stabilized in Previous Twelve Months
Property
 
Location
Acquisition Date
Percent Ownership (%)
Year Built
Purchase Price
 Rentable Square Footage
 Current Percent Leased (%)
 Percent Leased at Acquisition (%)
 Real Estate Gross Book Value
 Estimated Cost to Stabilize (per VACANT square foot)
1200 Enclave Parkway
Houston, TX
3/30/2011
100
1999
$18,500
150
100
18
$26,109
N/A
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 















(1)
The investment in this property was converted from a structured finance investment to an owned real estate asset through a UCC foreclosure of an equity ownership interest on March 31, 2011. The purchase price presented represents the estimated fair value of the real estate assets comprising the property as of the date of the transaction. The percent leased at acquisition reflects the space leased by Marsh USA as vacant, as the tenant had already announced plans to vacate prior to Piedmont's assumption of ownership of the asset.
(2)
The percent leased at acquisition reflects the space leased by BV Card Assets as vacant, as the tenant had already announced plans to vacate prior to Piedmont's acquisition of the property.

37



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Other Investments
As of March 31, 2013
($ and square footage in thousands)


Unconsolidated Joint Venture Properties
Property
Location
Percent Ownership (%)
Year Built
Piedmont Share of Real Estate Net Book Value
 Real Estate Net Book Value
 Rentable Square Footage
 Percent Leased (%)
20/20 Building
Leawood, KS
57
1992
$3,057
$5,385
68.3
73
4685 Investment Drive
Troy, MI
55
2000
4,912
8,930
77.1
100
5301 Maryland Way
Brentwood, TN
55
1989
10,446
18,989
201.2
100
8560 Upland Drive
Parker, CO
72
2001
7,593
10,563
148.2
74
Two Park Center
Hoffman Estates, IL
72
1999
10,886
15,142
193.7
39
 
 
 
 
$36,894
$59,009
688.5
74


Land Parcels
Property
Location
Acres
Approximate Current Value
 Gavitello
 Atlanta, GA
2.0
$2,500
 Glenridge Highlands III
 Atlanta, GA
3.0
1,725
 Enclave Parkway
 Houston, TX
4.7
2,600
 State Highway 161
 Irving, TX
4.5
1,200






14.2
$8,025



38



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Supplemental Definitions

Included in this section are management's statements regarding certain non-GAAP financial measures provided in this supplemental report and reasons why management believes that these measures provide useful information to investors about the Company's financial condition and results of operations. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures are included beginning on page 41.
Adjusted Funds From Operations ("AFFO"): AFFO is calculated by deducting from Core FFO non-incremental capital expenditures and acquisition-related costs and adding back non-cash items including non-real estate depreciation, straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue, non-cash components of interest expense and compensation expense, and by making similar adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Although AFFO may not be comparable to that of other REITs, we believe it provides a meaningful indicator of our ability to fund cash needs and to make cash distributions to equity owners. AFFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income, as an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities or as a measure of our liquidity.
 
Annualized Lease Revenue ("ALR"): ALR is calculated by multiplying (i) rental payments (defined as base rent plus operating expense reimbursements, if payable by the tenant on a monthly basis under the terms of a lease that has been executed, but excluding a) rental abatements and b) rental payments related to executed but not commenced leases for space that was covered by an existing lease), by (ii) 12. In instances in which contractual rents or operating expense reimbursements are collected on an annual, semi-annual, or quarterly basis, such amounts are multiplied by a factor of 1, 2, or 4, respectively, to calculate the annualized figure. For leases that have been executed but not commenced relating to un-leased space, ALR is calculated by multiplying (i) the monthly base rental payment (excluding abatements) plus any operating expense reimbursements for the initial month of the lease term, by (ii) 12. Unless stated otherwise, this measure excludes our unconsolidated joint venture interests.
 
Core EBITDA: Core EBITDA is defined as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and incrementally removing any impairment losses, gains or losses from sales of property, or other significant non-recurring items. We do not include impairment losses in this measure because we feel these types of losses create volatility in our earnings and make it difficult to determine the earnings generated by our ongoing business. We believe Core EBITDA is a reasonable measure of our liquidity. Core EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of cash flows from operating activities or other GAAP basis liquidity measures. Other REITs may calculate Core EBITDA differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.
 
Core Funds From Operations ("Core FFO"): We calculate Core FFO by starting with FFO, as defined by NAREIT, and adjusting for certain non-recurring items such as gains or losses on the early extinguishment of debt, acquisition-related costs and other significant non-recurring items. Such items create significant earnings volatility. We believe Core FFO provides a meaningful measure of our operating performance and more predictability regarding future earnings potential. Core FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income; therefore, it should not be compared to other REITs' equivalent to Core FFO.
 
EBITDA: EBITDA is defined as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We believe EBITDA is an appropriate measure of our ability to incur and service debt. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, as a measure of our liquidity or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating activities. Other REITs may calculate EBITDA differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.
 
Funds From Operations ("FFO"): FFO is calculated in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") definition. NAREIT currently defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property and impairment losses, adding back depreciation and amortization on real estate assets, and after the same adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. These adjustments can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates. FFO may provide valuable comparisons of operating performance between periods and with other REITs. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be viewed as an alternative measurement of our operating performance to net income. We believe that FFO is a beneficial indicator of the performance of an equity REIT. However, other REITs may not define FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do; therefore, our computation of FFO may not be comparable to that of such other REITs.
 
Gross Assets: Gross assets is defined as total assets with the add back of accumulated depreciation and accumulated amortization related to real estate assets.
 
Gross Real Estate Assets: Gross real estate assets is defined as total real estate assets with the add back of accumulated depreciation and accumulated amortization related to real estate assets.
 
Incremental Capital Expenditures: Incremental Capital Expenditures are defined as capital expenditures of a non-recurring nature that incrementally enhance the underlying assets' income generating capacity. Tenant improvements, leasing commissions, building capital and deferred lease incentives ("Leasing Costs") incurred to lease space that was vacant at acquisition, Leasing Costs for spaces vacant for greater than one year, Leasing Costs for spaces at newly acquired properties for which in-place leases expire shortly after acquisition, improvements associated with the expansion of a building and renovations that change the underlying classification of a building are included in this measure.
 
NOI from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures: NOI from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures is defined as Property NOI attributable to our interests in properties owned through unconsolidated partnerships. We present this measure on an accrual basis and a cash basis, which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. NOI from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures is a non-GAAP measure and therefore may not be comparable to similarly defined data provided by other REITs.
 
Non-Incremental Capital Expenditures: Non-Incremental Capital Expenditures are defined as capital expenditures of a recurring nature related to tenant improvements and leasing commissions that do not incrementally enhance the underlying assets' income generating capacity. We exclude first generation tenant improvements and leasing commissions from this measure, in addition to other capital expenditures that qualify as Incremental Capital Expenditures, as defined above.
 
Property Net Operating Income ("Property NOI"): Property NOI is defined as real estate operating income with the add-back of corporate general and administrative expense, depreciation and amortization, and impairment losses and the deduction of income and expense associated with lease terminations and income associated with property management performed by Piedmont for other organizations. We present this measure on an accrual basis and a cash basis, which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. The Company uses this measure to assess its operating results and believes it is important in assessing operating performance. Property NOI is a non-GAAP measure which does not have any standard meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.
 
Same Store Net Operating Income ("Same Store NOI"): Same Store NOI is calculated as the Property NOI attributable to the properties owned or placed in service during the entire span of the current and prior year reporting periods. Same Store NOI excludes amounts attributable to unconsolidated joint venture assets. We present this measure on an accrual basis and a cash basis, which eliminates the effects of straight lined rents and fair value lease revenue. We believe Same Store NOI is an important measure of comparison of our properties' operating performance from one period to another. Other REITs may calculate Same Store NOI differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.
 
Same Store Properties: Same Store Properties is defined as properties owned or placed in service during the entire span of the current and prior year reporting periods. Same Store Properties excludes unconsolidated joint venture assets. We believe Same Store Properties is an important measure of comparison of our stabilized portfolio performance.

39



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Research Coverage


Paul E. Adornato, CFA
Michael Knott, CFA
Vance H. Edelson
BMO Capital Markets
John Bejjani
Morgan Stanley
3 Times Square, 26th Floor
Green Street Advisors
1585 Broadway, 38th Floor
New York, NY 10036
660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 800
New York, NY 10036
Phone: (212) 885-4170
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone: (212) 761-0078
 
Phone: (949) 640-8780
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Brendan Maiorana
John W. Guinee, III
Richard Moore
Wells Fargo
Erin Aslakson
Michael Carroll
7 St. Paul Street
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company
RBC Capital Markets
MAC R1230-011
One South Street
Arbor Court
Baltimore, MD 21202
16th Floor
30575 Bainbridge Road, Suite 250
Phone: (443) 263-6516
Baltimore, MD 21202
Solon, OH 44139
 
Phone: (443) 224-1307
Phone: (440) 715-2646
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anthony Paolone, CFA
David Rodgers, CFA
 
JP Morgan
Robert W. Baird & Co.
 
277 Park Avenue
200 Public Square
 
New York, NY 10172
Suite 1650
 
Phone: (212) 622-6682
Cleveland, OH 44139
 
 
Phone: (216) 737-7341
 



40



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Funds From Operations, Core Funds From Operations, and Adjusted Funds From Operations Reconciliations
Unaudited (in thousands)

 
 Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013
 
12/31/2012
 
9/30/2012
 
6/30/2012
 
3/31/2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Piedmont
$
14,651

 
$
14,438

 
$
10,831

 
$
30,708

 
$
37,227

Depreciation
29,886

 
29,735

 
28,763

 
28,033

 
27,809

Amortization
9,220

 
10,666

 
15,366

 
11,539

 
12,840

(Gain) / loss on sale of properties

 
6

 
254

 
(10,008
)
 
(17,830
)
Impairment loss
6,402

 

 

 

 

Funds from operations
60,159

 
54,845

 
55,214

 
60,272

 
60,046

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition costs
1,244

 
53

 
7

 
84

 
(3
)
Litigation settlement expense

 

 
7,500

 

 

Net casualty (gain) / loss
161

 
5,170

 

 

 

Core funds from operations
61,564

 
60,068

 
62,721

 
60,356

 
60,043

Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred financing cost amortization
594

 
592

 
663

 
590

 
803

Depreciation of non real estate assets
98

 
104

 
196

 
108

 
93

Straight-line effects of lease revenue
(4,032
)
 
(5,917
)
 
(4,193
)
 
(5,477
)
 
(1,565
)
Stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense
594

 
754

 
869

 
289

 
334

Amortization of lease-related intangibles
(1,065
)
 
(1,046
)
 
(1,315
)
 
(1,785
)
 
(1,532
)
Acquisition costs
(1,244
)
 
(53
)
 
(7
)
 
(84
)
 
3

Non-incremental capital expenditures
(19,920
)
 
(23,227
)
 
(38,583
)
 
(17,781
)
 
(8,066
)
Adjusted funds from operations
$
36,589

 
$
31,275

 
$
20,351

 
$
36,216

 
$
50,113


41



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Same Store Net Operating Income (Cash Basis)
Unaudited (in thousands)


 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013
 
12/31/2012
 
9/30/2012
 
6/30/2012
 
3/31/2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to Piedmont
$
14,651

 
$
14,438

 
$
10,831

 
$
30,708

 
$
37,227

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
4

 
4

 
4

 
4

 
4

Interest expense
16,373

 
16,296

 
16,247

 
15,943

 
16,537

Depreciation
29,984

 
29,839

 
28,959

 
28,141

 
27,902

Amortization
9,220

 
10,666

 
15,366

 
11,539

 
12,840

Acquisition costs
1,244

 
53

 
7

 
84

 
(3
)
Impairment loss
6,402

 

 

 

 

Litigation settlement expense

 

 
7,500

 

 

Net casualty (gain) / loss
161

 
5,170

 

 

 

(Gain) / loss on sale of properties

 
6

 
254

 
(10,008
)
 
(17,830
)
Core EBITDA
78,039

 
76,472

 
79,168

 
76,411

 
76,677

General & administrative expenses
4,609

 
5,179

 
5,576

 
4,866

 
5,318

Management fee revenue
(631
)
 
(599
)
 
(520
)
 
(626
)
 
(574
)
Interest and other income
21

 
(121
)
 
(390
)
 
(389
)
 
(94
)
Lease termination income

 
(712
)
 
(75
)
 
(88
)
 
(123
)
Lease termination expense - straight line rent & acquisition intangibles write-offs
25

 
618

 
122

 
165

 
99

Straight-line effects of lease revenue
(4,057
)
 
(6,536
)
 
(4,337
)
 
(5,642
)
 
(1,664
)
Net effect of amortization of above/(below) market in-place lease intangibles
(1,065
)
 
(1,046
)
 
(1,293
)
 
(1,785
)
 
(1,532
)
Property net operating income - cash basis
76,941

 
73,255

 
78,251

 
72,912

 
78,107

Net operating income from:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisitions
(836
)
 
17

 
7

 

 

Dispositions
166

 
(259
)
 
(542
)
 
(784
)
 
(1,928
)
Unconsolidated joint ventures
(744
)
 
(576
)
 
(735
)
 
(598
)
 
(590
)
Same store net operating income - cash basis
$
75,527

 
$
72,437

 
$
76,981

 
$
71,530

 
$
75,589


42



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Net Operating Income Reconciliations
Pro rata (in thousands)


 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013
 
12/31/2012
 
9/30/2012
 
6/30/2012
 
3/31/2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
$
395

 
$
185

 
$
322

 
$
246

 
$
170

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
300

 
290

 
307

 
300

 
296

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization
41

 
34

 
41

 
41

 
41

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impairment loss

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Gain) / loss on sale of properties

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Core EBITDA
736

 
509

 
670

 
587

 
507

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative expenses
60

 
45

 
30

 
(3
)
 
57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest and other income

 

 

 
(21
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property net operating income (accrual basis)
796

 
554

 
700

 
563

 
564

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Straight-line effects of lease revenue
(52
)
 
22

 
35

 
35

 
26

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net effect of amortization of above/(below) market in-place lease intangibles

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property net operating income (cash basis)
$
744

 
$
576

 
$
735

 
$
598

 
$
590


43



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Discontinued Operations
Unaudited (in thousands)


 
Three Months Ended
 
3/31/2013
 
12/31/2012
 
9/30/2012
 
6/30/2012
 
3/31/2012
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
962

 
$
2,495

 
$
1,797

 
$
2,153

 
$
2,680

Tenant reimbursements
247

 
65

 
322

 
288

 
459

Other rental income

 

 

 

 

 
1,209

 
2,560

 
2,119

 
2,441

 
3,139

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating costs
749

 
870

 
1,178

 
1,231

 
1,197

Depreciation
264

 
446

 
591

 
611

 
754

Amortization
61

 
126

 
159

 
182

 
186

General and administrative

 
(2
)
 
38

 
5

 
3

 
1,074

 
1,440

 
1,966

 
2,029

 
2,140

Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income (expense)
12

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 
12

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income, excluding impairment loss and gain on sale
147

 
1,120

 
153

 
412

 
999

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impairment loss
(6,402
)
 

 

 

 

Gain / (loss) on sale of properties

 
(6
)
 
(254
)
 
10,008

 
17,830

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from discontinued operations
$
(6,255
)
 
$
1,114

 
$
(101
)
 
$
10,420

 
$
18,829




44



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Property Detail
As of March 31, 2013
(in thousands)

Property
City
State
Percent Ownership
Year Built
Rentable Square Footage Owned
Leased Percentage
Commenced Leased Percentage
Economic Leased Percentage (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Atlanta


 








11695 Johns Creek Parkway
 Johns Creek
 GA
100.0%
2001
101
78.2
%
78.2
%
78.2
%
3750 Brookside Parkway
 Alpharetta
 GA
100.0%
2001
103
57.3
%
57.3
%
57.3
%
Glenridge Highlands Two
 Atlanta
 GA
100.0%
2000
426
81.7
%
71.1
%
67.6
%
Suwanee Gateway One
 Suwanee
 GA
100.0%
2008
142
0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

The Dupree
 Atlanta
 GA
100.0%
1997
138
82.6
%
82.6
%
79.0
%
The Medici
 Atlanta
 GA
100.0%
2008
152
32.2
%
32.2
%
23.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




1,062
61.1
%
56.9
%
53.7
%
Austin








Braker Pointe III
 Austin
 TX
100.0%
2001
195
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




195
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Boston








1200 Crown Colony Drive
 Quincy
 MA
100.0%
1990
235
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
90 Central Street
 Boxborough
 MA
100.0%
2001
175
99.4
%
99.4
%
99.4
%
1414 Massachusetts Avenue
 Cambridge
 MA
100.0%
1873
78
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
One Brattle Square
 Cambridge
 MA
100.0%
1991
95
94.7
%
94.7
%
94.7
%
225 Presidential Way
 Woburn
 MA
100.0%
2001
202
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
235 Presidential Way
 Woburn
 MA
100.0%
2000
238
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
5 & 15 Wayside Road
 Burlington
 MA
100.0%
1999 / 2001
271
95.6
%
95.6
%
95.6
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




1,294
98.6
%
98.6
%
98.6
%
Chicago








Windy Point I
 Schaumburg
 IL
100.0%
1999
187
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Windy Point II
 Schaumburg
 IL
100.0%
2001
301
100.0
%
83.1
%
0.0%

Aon Center
 Chicago
 IL
100.0%
1972
2,688
81.0
%
79.1
%
67.0
%
Two Pierce Place
 Itasca
 IL
100.0%
1991
486
82.7
%
80.9
%
78.2
%
2300 Cabot Drive
 Lisle
 IL
100.0%
1998
152
75.7
%
76.3
%
76.3
%
500 West Monroe Street
 Chicago
 IL
100.0%
1991
966
60.0
%
51.1
%
12.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




4,780
78.7
%
74.6
%
54.4
%
Cleveland








Eastpoint I
 Mayfield Heights
 OH
100.0%
2000
83
0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Eastpoint II
 Mayfield Heights
 OH
100.0%
2000
85
88.2
%
88.2
%
88.2
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




168
44.6
%
44.6
%
44.6
%

45



Property
City
State
Percent Ownership
Year Built
Rentable Square Footage Owned
Leased Percentage
Commenced Leased Percentage
Economic Leased Percentage (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dallas








3900 Dallas Parkway
 Plano
 TX
100.0%
1999
120
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
5601 Headquarters Drive
 Plano
 TX
100.0%
2001
166
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
6031 Connection Drive
 Irving
 TX
100.0%
1999
232
87.9
%
83.2
%
76.3
%
6021 Connection Drive
 Irving
 TX
100.0%
2000
223
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
6011 Connection Drive
 Irving
 TX
100.0%
1999
152
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Las Colinas Corporate Center I
 Irving
 TX
100.0%
1998
159
100.0
%
100.0
%
53.5
%
Las Colinas Corporate Center II
 Irving
 TX
100.0%
1998
227
61.7
%
61.2
%
52.9
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




1,279
91.0
%
90.1
%
81.5
%
Denver








350 Spectrum Loop
 Colorado Springs
 CO
100.0%
2001
156
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




156
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Detroit








1441 West Long Lake Road
 Troy
 MI
100.0%
1999
107
89.7
%
81.3
%
77.6
%
150 West Jefferson Avenue
 Detroit
 MI
100.0%
1989
493
75.9
%
74.2
%
60.9
%
Auburn Hills Corporate Center
 Auburn Hills
 MI
100.0%
2001
120
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
1075 West Entrance Drive
 Auburn Hills
 MI
100.0%
2001
210
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




930
86.0
%
84.2
%
76.7
%
Central & South Florida








Sarasota Commerce Center II
Sarasota
FL
100.0%
1999
152
100.0
%
98.7
%
55.3
%
5601 Hiatus Road
Tamarac
FL
100.0%
2001
100
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
2001 NW 64th Street
Ft. Lauderdale
FL
100.0%
2001
48
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
400 TownPark
Lake Mary
FL
100.0%
2008
176
34.1
%
34.1
%
34.1
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




476
75.6
%
75.2
%
61.3
%
Houston








1430 Enclave Parkway
Houston
TX
100.0%
1994
313
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
1200 Enclave Parkway
Houston
TX
100.0%
1999
150
100.0
%
100.0
%
67.3
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




463
100.0
%
100.0
%
89.4
%
Los Angeles








800 North Brand Boulevard
Glendale
CA
100.0%
1990
518
80.3
%
80.3
%
80.3
%
1055 East Colorado Boulevard
Pasadena
CA
100.0%
2001
175
98.9
%
50.3
%
50.3
%
Fairway Center II
Brea
CA
100.0%
2002
134
97.8
%
97.8
%
78.4
%
1901 Main Street
Irvine
CA
100.0%
2001
172
87.2
%
73.8
%
43.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




999
87.1
%
76.3
%
68.4
%
Minneapolis








Crescent Ridge II
Minnetonka
MN
100.0%
2000
301
75.1
%
74.8
%
68.8
%
US Bancorp Center
Minneapolis
MN
100.0%
2000
928
95.5
%
95.4
%
95.3
%
One Meridian Crossings
Richfield
MN
100.0%
1997
195
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Two Meridian Crossings
Richfield
MN
100.0%
1998
189
91.5
%
91.5
%
86.8
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




1,613
91.8
%
91.6
%
89.9
%

46



Property
City
State
Percent Ownership
Year Built
Rentable Square Footage Owned
Leased Percentage
Commenced Leased Percentage
Economic Leased Percentage (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nashville








2120 West End Avenue
Nashville
TN
100.0%
2000
312
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




312
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
New York








2 Gatehall Drive
Parsippany
NJ
100.0%
1985
405
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
200 Bridgewater Crossing
Bridgewater
NJ
100.0%
2002
299
83.3
%
83.3
%
30.1
%
Copper Ridge Center
Lyndhurst
NJ
100.0%
1989
268
94.4
%
94.4
%
89.9
%
60 Broad Street
New York
NY
100.0%
1962
1,027
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
600 Corporate Drive
Lebanon
NJ
100.0%
2005
125
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
400 Bridgewater Crossing
Bridgewater
NJ
100.0%
2002
298
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




2,422
97.3
%
97.3
%
90.3
%
Philadelphia








1901 Market Street
Philadelphia
PA
100.0%
1987
761
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




761
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Phoenix








River Corporate Center
Tempe
AZ
100.0%
1998
133
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
8700 South Price Road
Tempe
AZ
100.0%
2000
132
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Desert Canyon 300
Phoenix
AZ
100.0%
2001
149
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Chandler Forum
Chandler
AZ
100.0%
2003
150
42.0
%
42.0
%
42.0
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




564
84.6
%
84.6
%
84.6
%
Washington, D.C.








11107 Sunset Hills Road
Reston
VA
100.0%
1985
101
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
1201 Eye Street
Washington
DC
49.5% (2)
2001
269
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
1225 Eye Street
Washington
DC
49.5% (2)
1986
225
86.2
%
86.2
%
82.2
%
3100 Clarendon Boulevard
Arlington
VA
100.0%
1987
250
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
400 Virginia Avenue
Washington
DC
100.0%
1985
224
92.9
%
92.9
%
91.1
%
4250 North Fairfax Drive
Arlington
VA
100.0%
1998
305
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
9211 Corporate Boulevard
Rockville
MD
100.0%
1989
115
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
9221 Corporate Boulevard
Rockville
MD
100.0%
1989
115
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
One Independence Square
Washington
DC
100.0%
1991
334
0.3
%
0.3
%
0.3
%
9200 Corporate Boulevard
Rockville
MD
100.0%
1982
109
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
11109 Sunset Hills Road
Reston
VA
100.0%
1984
41
0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

Two Independence Square
Washington
DC
100.0%
1991
561
100.0
%
100.0
%
99.8
%
Piedmont Pointe I
Bethesda
MD
100.0%
2007
186
68.8
%
68.8
%
66.1
%
Piedmont Pointe II
Bethesda
MD
100.0%
2008
221
50.2
%
50.2
%
31.7
%
Arlington Gateway (3)
Arlington
VA
100.0%
2005
323
98.8
%
98.8
%
98.8
%
Metropolitan Area Subtotal / Weighted Average




3,379
82.5
%
82.5
%
80.7
%









Grand Total




20,853
86.0
%
84.2
%
76.4
%









(1)
Economic leased percentage excludes the square footage associated with executed but not commenced leases for currently vacant spaces and the square footage associated with tenants receiving rental abatements (after proportional adjustments for tenants receiving only partial rent abatements).
(2)
Although Piedmont owns 49.5% of the asset, it is entitled to 100% of the cash flows under the terms of the property ownership entity's joint venture agreement.
(3)
The property consists of approximately 334,000 square feet; however, due to the square footages referenced in several leases, the rentable square footage is currently 323,000 square feet. As the existing leases expire, the affected spaces will be re-leased to the correct square footages.

47



Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Supplemental Operating & Financial Data
Risks, Uncertainties and Limitations


Certain statements contained in this supplemental package constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We intend for all such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, as applicable. Such information is subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue” or similar words or phrases that are predictions of future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters.

The following are some of the factors that could cause our actual results and expectations to differ materially from those described in our forward-looking statements: market and economic conditions remain challenging and the demand for office space, rental rates and property values may continue to lag the general economic recovery causing our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and access to capital to be adversely affected or otherwise impact performance, including the potential recognition of impairment charges; the success of our real estate strategies and investment objectives, including our ability to identify and consummate suitable acquisitions; lease terminations or lease defaults, particularly by one of our large lead tenants; the impact of competition on our efforts to renew existing leases or re-let space on terms similar to existing leases; changes in the economies and other conditions of the office market in general and of the specific markets in which we operate, particularly in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and the New York metropolitan area; economic and regulatory changes, including accounting standards, that impact the real estate market generally; additional risks and costs associated with directly managing properties occupied by government tenants; adverse market and economic conditions may continue to adversely affect us and could cause us to recognize impairment charges or otherwise impact our performance; availability of financing and our lending banks' ability to honor existing line of credit commitments; costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations; uncertainties associated with environmental and other regulatory matters; potential changes in political environment and reduction in federal and/or state funding of our governmental tenants; we may be subject to litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition; our ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code; and other factors detailed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this supplemental report. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this supplemental report, and we do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.



48