Form 8-K

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 8-K

 

 

Current Report

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): 04/01/2009

 

 

Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Commission File Number: 000-25739

 

MD   58-2328421

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation)

 

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

11695 Johns Creek Parkway

Suite 350

Johns Creek, GA 30097-1523

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

770-418-8800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

 

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 

¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

 

 


Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure

On April 1, 2009, Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Registrant”) began a series of regional stockholder meetings and will use the presentation attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K for these meetings throughout April 2009. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such exhibit and the information set forth therein are deemed to have been furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Additionally, the exhibit to this Form 8-K may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including discussions regarding any liquidity event of the Registrant and other factors that may affect future earnings or financial results. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the Registrant’s use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe” or other similar words. Information given in this exhibit relating to leasing, the Registrant’s estimated net asset value and other facts and figures are given as of the date of this filing. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially include changes in general economic conditions, changes in real estate conditions, increases in interest rates, lease-up risks, lack of availability of financing or other capital proceeds and additional borrowings under our unsecured line of credit or other debt facilities. Piedmont Office Realty Trust is closed to new investors. SEC filings: www.sec.gov.


Signature(s)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

  Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Date: April 01, 2009   By:  

/s/ Robert E. Bowers

    Robert E. Bowers
    Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice-President


Exhibit Index

 

Exhibit No.

  

Description

EX 99.1    April 2009 Regional Stockholder Meeting Presentation
April 2009 Regional Stockholder Meeting Presentation
©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Investor Presentation
Donald A. Miller, CFA
President & CEO
Exhibit 99.1


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
What Piedmont Wants You To Know
Certain statements contained herein may be deemed to be forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws, and Piedmont intends that such forward-
looking statements be subject to the safe-harbor provisions.  All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.  Such 
statements generally can be identified by our use of words such as “may,”  “will,” “can,”  “intend,” “anticipate,”  “estimate,” “think,” “continue,” or other similar words.
Legislative, economic, and financial factors could cause actual results to vary materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.
The points made in this presentation represent the intentions of
Piedmont’s management team to focus on putting the investor first. 
Uncertainties in the regulatory, economic, and real estate markets
may adversely affect the company’s ability to meet it’s objectives. 
If Real Estate initiatives cannot attract financially stable tenants,
vacancies or defaults may occur that may reduce the portfolio’s
return.
Properties that incur vacancies may be difficult to sell or re-lease.
Future financial performance of the company and the performance of
real estate is difficult to predict.
Information is accurate at the time of the presentation; however, lease
dates and the ability to meet our stated objectives are subject to
change.
Data presented reflects Piedmont portfolio as of December 31, 2008.


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
History
June 1998 –
Active operations commenced
December 2003 –
Closed fourth and final offering
$5.2bn of equity raised (including DRP proceeds)
April 2005 –
27 property portfolio sale
$189.5mm gain
$748.5mm special dividend
April 2007 –
Advisor internalization
76 employees of the former advisor became our employees
July 2007 –
Received investment grade credit ratings
BBB from S&P and Baa3 from Moody’s (reaffirmed Feb. 2009)
August 2007 –
Name change and new website
Changed name from Wells REIT to Piedmont Office Realty Trust
Launched new website (www.piedmontreit.com)
December 2007 –
Liquidity event extension approved
Extended for up to 3 years from January 30, 2008
Subject to SEC reporting/filing since inception


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Portfolio Characteristics
92%
% Leased
1
34%
Leverage Ratio (estimated NAV basis)
3
85%
%
Leased
Office
Building
Industry
Average
2
63%
Leverage
Ratio
Publicly
Traded
REIT
Office
Average
4
6
Weighted
Average
Lease
Term
Remaining
(years)
1
76
# of Properties
1
21,012
Square
Feet
(in
thousands)
1
As of December 31,
2008
1
Excludes eight unconsolidated joint-venture properties
2
Source: Jones Lang LaSalle North America Office Report Q4 2008
3
Calculated as total liabilities / current value of assets
4
Source: Green Street Advisors, Inc. March 18, 2009


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Senior Management
Carroll A. (Bo) Reddic, IV
EVP, Real Estate Operations
Donald A. Miller, CFA
President & CEO
Robert E. Bowers
CFO
Raymond L. Owens
EVP, Capital Markets
Lisa M. Tyler
Director,
Human Resources
Laura P. Moon
Chief Accounting Officer
Alison M. Mills
Director,
Risk Management


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Property Management Offices
New Hampshire
W.
Virginia
Maine
Rhode Island
Connecticut
Manhattan / L.I.
New Jersey
Delaware
Maryland
D.C.
Massachusetts
Vermont
New York
Pennsylvania
N.Carolina
Virginia
Washington
Oregon
California
Nevada
Utah
Arizona
Idaho
Montana
Wyoming
Colorado
New Mexico
Tennessee
Oklahoma
Louisiana
Missis-
sippi
Alabama
Arkansas
Georgia
Florida
Texas
S. Carolina
Nebraska
South Dakota
North Dakota
Iowa
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Kentucky
Indiana
Michigan
Kansas
Missouri
Illinois
Ohio
Regional Office
City Office
SOUTH
REGION
Tampa
5.3 Million SF Managed
MIDWEST
REGION
Minneapolis
5.9 Million SF Managed
WEST REGION
Los Angeles
2.9 Million SF Managed
EAST REGION
Washington DC
4.0 Million SF Managed


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Foundations of Conservative Real Estate
Investment Strategy
High-quality properties/stable income stream
Real estate diversification
Lower leverage


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Quality Properties
One & Two Independence Square
Washington, D.C.
35 West Wacker
Drive
Chicago, IL
800 North Brand Boulevard
Glendale, CA
Glenridge
Highlands II
Atlanta, GA


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
60 Broad Street
New York, NY
Piedmont Properties
AON Center
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL
1201 Eye Street
Washington, D.C.


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
200 & 400 Crossing Boulevard
Bridgewater, NJ
1901 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA
Nine Polito
Avenue
Lyndhurst, NJ


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
Lockheed Martin I & II
Corporate Boulevard
Rockville, MD
Piedmont Pointe I & II
Rockledge Drive
Bethesda, MD
1201 Eye Street
Washington, D.C.


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Quality Properties
35 West Wacker
Drive
Chicago, IL
800 North Brand Boulevard
Glendale, CA
Glenridge
Highlands II
Atlanta, GA
60 Broad Street
New York, NY


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
AON Center
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL
Nokia
Connection Drive
Irving, TX
US Bancorp
800 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
One & Two Independence Square
Washington D.C.
1201 Eye Street
Washington D.C.
4250 N. Fairfax
Arlington, VA


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
60 Broad Street
New York, NY
Piedmont Properties
AON Center
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL
Glenridge
Highlands II
5565 Glenridge
Connector
Atlanta, GA


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
1055 East Colorado
Pasadena, CA
Nestle
800 North Brand Boulevard
Glendale, CA
1901 Main Street
Irvine, CA


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
Las Colinas Corporate Center I & II
North State Hwy. 161
Irving, TX
Nokia
Connection Drive
Irving, TX
Harcourt
North MoPac
Expressway
Austin, TX


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
th
Piedmont Properties
Bellsouth Advertising
2001 NW 64
Street
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Convergys
5601 Hiatus Road
Tamarac, FL
Sarasota Commerce Center II
101 Arthur Anderson Parkway
Sarasota, FL


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
3750 Brookside Parkway
Alpharetta, GA
11695 Johns Creek Parkway
Johns Creek, GA
Glenridge
Highlands II
5565 Glenridge
Connector
Atlanta, GA


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
US Bancorp
800 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN
Crescent Ridge II
10900 Wayzata Boulevard
Minnetonka, MN
Two Pierce Place
Itasca, IL


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
35 W. Wacker
Chicago, IL
Windy Pointe I & II
McConnor
Parkway
Schaumburg, IL
AON Center
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
AON Center
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL
Glenridge
Highlands II
5565 Glenridge
Connector
Atlanta, GA
1901 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Properties
200 & 400 Crossing Boulevard
Bridgewater, NJ
Nine Polito
Avenue
Lyndhurst, NJ
60 Broad Street
New York, NY


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Financial Highlights
$593.2
$622.0
$571.4
$500.0
$550.0
$600.0
$650.0
2006
2007
2008
$285.5
$294.9
$275.8
$200.0
$250.0
$300.0
2006
2007
2008
Funds From Operations
Revenues
For years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 (in millions)
$112.1
$131.3
$96.9
$50.0
$100.0
$150.0
2006
2007
2008
Income From Continuing Operations
4%
5%
16%
17%
4%
3%


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Tenant Base
Tenant diversification (as of December 31, 2008)
Tenant Name
(Ranked by % of AGR)
Annualized
Gross Rental
Revenues
($000's)
Percentage of
Annualized
Gross Rental
Revenues
S&P Credit
Rating
US Government (11 agencies)
61,823
11.4%
AAA
BP Corporation
25,565
4.7%
AA
Leo
Burnett
(Publicis)
1
20,959
3.9%
BBB+
State of New York
19,873
3.7%
AA-
Nestle
18,311
3.4%
AA
US Bancorp
17,311
3.2%
AA
Sanofi-Aventis
17,070
3.1%
AA-
Kirkland
&
Ellis
2
15,775
2.9%
N/A
Independence Blue Cross
15,565
2.9%
N/A
Winston
&
Strawn
3
14,468
2.7%
N/A
Zurich American
10,395
1.9%
AA-
DDB
Needham
(Omnicom)
4
10,065
1.8%
A-
Shaw Facilities
9,514
1.7%
BB+
Lockheed Martin
9,186
1.7%
A-
State Street Bank
8,694
1.6%
AA
Other
5
269,715
49.4%
544,289
100.0%
1
Rating is for parent company, Publicis Groupe SA
2
Kirkland & Ellis is ranked # 7 by The America Lawyer’s 2007 AmLaw 100 Rankings
3
Winston & Strawn is ranked # 33 by The America Lawyer’s 2007 AmLaw 100 Rankings
4
Rating is for parent company, Omnicom Group
5
Includes leases which terminated effective December 31, 2008


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Real Estate Diversification


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Geographic Diversification
Percentage of annualized gross rental revenues (as of December 31, 2008)
25%
19%
16%
6%
6%
4%
4%
4%
3%
3%
2%
2%
1%
1%
4%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
22.0%
24.0%
26.0%
28.0%
30.0%


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Industry Diversification
Percentage of annualized gross rental revenues (as of December 31, 2008)
for all industries representing 3% or greater
16%
14%
9%
7%
5%
5%
5%
5%
3%
3%
3%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
18.0%


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Lease Expiration Schedule
Percentage of annualized gross rental revenues (as of December 31, 2008)
8%
9%
16%
19%
12%
8%
5%
5%
2%
5%
4%
1%
0%
1%
5%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
18.0%
19.0%
20.0%


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Leverage


2
2
©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Leverage Ratios
Piedmont
(Based
on
estimated
NAV
of
$7.40
per
share)
34%
Publicly Traded REIT Office Sector Average
63%
All Publicly Traded REIT Sectors Average
66%
Leverage Ratio
1
1
Total liabilities as a percentage of current value of assets.
2
Source: Green Street Advisors, Inc. March 18, 2009


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Debt Maturities
$695
$45
$140
$168
$105
$250
$121
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Secured debt
Unsecured debt
1
The
schedule
assumes
one-year
extensions
for
the
$250
Million
Unsecured
Term
Loan
and
for
the
$500
Million
Unsecured
Line
of
Credit.
1
1
Debt maturity schedule as of December 31, 2008 ($ in millions)


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
6.0%
6.1%
6.4%
7.3%
6.0%
5.8%
5.4%
4.3%
6.0%
5.4%
4.4%
1.3%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
5.50% Rate
6.50% Rate
7.50% Rate
Interest Rate
0% Loan-to-Value
25% Loan-to-Value
50% Loan-to-Value
75% Loan-to-Value
Assumptions:
Initial Cap Rate = 7.0%
Initial After Fee Return = 6.0%
10-yr Note = 4.50%
Borrowing Rate = 5.50%
Interest-Only Debt
Assume interest rates increase
Assume portfolio is refinanced
Hypothetical
for
illustrative
purposes
only
and
do
not
represent
the
past
or
future
performance
of
any
product.
Hypothetical Effects of Interest Rates and Cap
Rates on a Leveraged Real Estate Portfolio


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Assumptions:
Initial Cap Rate = 7.0%
Initial After-Fee Return = 6.0%
10-yr Note = 4.50%
Assume interest rates increase
by 100-200 basis points
Increase in interest rate leads
to commensurate increase in
cap rates
Increased cap rate results in a
decline in the market value of
the portfolio
Hypothetical Effects of Interest Rates and Cap
Rates on a Leveraged Real Estate Portfolio
Market Value
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-12.5%
-16.7%
-25.0%
-50.0%
-22.2%
-29.6%
-44.4%
-88.8%
-
90.0%
-
80.0%
-70.0%
-
60.0%
-
50.0%
-
40.0%
-
30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
7.00% Rate
8.00% Rate
9.00% Rate
Capitalization Rate
0% Loan-to-Value
25% Loan-to-Value
50% Loan-to-Value
75% Loan-to-Value
Hypothetical – for illustrative purposes only and do not represent the past or future performance of any product.


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Investment Strategy


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Execution of Investment Strategy
Strive to produce attractive risk adjusted returns
Tenant relationships/landlord of choice
Expense management/strong stewardship
Opportunities to create value/leasing activity
Capitalize on (selective) strategic investment opportunities
Create an attractive liquidity event (while keeping all
options open) as soon as practical


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Investor Performance Comparison –
1999 and 2004 Investor
Compound Annual Growth Rate of Piedmont vs. Other Indices Over a
5-Year and 10-Year Hold Period
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
10-Year Hold
5-Year Hold
Piedmont
NAREIT (Office Only)
S&P 500
BC Agg Bond Index
Note: Piedmont returns are net of investment management fees.
1/1/99 to 12/31/08
1/1/04 to 12/31/08


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Investor Payback on Initial Capital Outlay
Note: Analysis assumes all shares are purchased on the first day of any given Investment Year.
Percentage of Initial Outlay Paid Back Based on Investment Year
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
Investment Year


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Opportunities to Create Value


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Lease Extensions/Restructuring
Three-building Nokia complex acquired in August
2002
Originally Building I and III leased through July
2009
Early termination of Building III lease effective July
2006 with concurrent re-lease to Goldman Sachs
affiliate from January 2007 through March 2018
Mid 2007, negotiated early termination of Building I
lease effective July 2008 and extended Building II
lease through December 2015
Goldman Sachs affiliate expanded into Building I
for an additional 82,686 SF through March 2018,
concurrent with Building III
lease
Signed one floor lease (28,000 SF) with Interstate
Bakeries through 2014 for Building I
Lease restructuring offers extended term and
Goldman Sachs credit (S&P A)
Dallas, TX
604,243 SF
$119.9mm Purchase Price


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Acquired December 2000
Sysco Corporation leased 106,516 SF
through September 2008
Shaw Group leased 206,048 SF through
December 2010
Sysco started construction on a corporate
campus in 2005 to consolidate operations
Shaw Group executed an early renewal
and expansion in 2008 for the entire
building through December 2018
Shaw Group renewal and expansion
maintains 100% occupancy and eliminates
downtime
Lease Extension/Restructuring
Houston, TX
312,564 SF
$45mm Purchase Price


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Atlanta, GA
406,241 SF
$84mm Purchase Price
Acquired August 2003
Originally 76% leased to Cingular
through December 2010
AT&T acquired Cingular in 2006 and
exercised termination option effective
December 2008
First Data Corp consolidating operations
from Denver and Omaha
Executed lease with First Data Corp for
183,375 SF through February 2020
First Data lease backfills nearly 60% of
terminated space with little downtime
Leasing Activity


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Kirkland & Ellis lease for 497,800 SF
expires in December 2011
KPMG leased 260,641 SF of the Kirkland
& Ellis space through August 2027
Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago
subleased 63,402 SF through December
2013 and converts to a direct lease
through December 2024
Microsoft leased 78,163 SF through
October 2019, absorbing 3% of vacant
space
Increased occupancy from 88% to 93%
and reduced rollover risk
Leasing Activity
Chicago, IL
2,678,252 SF
$465.2mm Purchase Price


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Recent Decisions


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Recent Decisions By Piedmont Board
Estimated net asset value reduced from $8.70 to $7.40
Dividend reduced from $0.5868 to $0.42 per share per annum
Reset DRP pricing –
95% of NAV ($7.03)
Reset SRP pricing –
lower of cost or 95% of NAV ($7.03)
Limited SRP to $100 million in 2009 –
estimated proceeds from
the dividend reinvestment plan


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Determination of Estimated Net Asset Value
By prospectus, update valuations each year
Average cost/share = $8.38 (original cost –
return of capital)
Valuation to date:
September 30, 2005    $8.70
September 30, 2006    $8.93
December 31, 2007    $8.70
December 31, 2008    $7.40
Hired outside appraisal firm to value all properties
Take estimated current value of properties, debt and receivables,
enter into balance sheet and divide by number of shares


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Dividend Cuts
(Source-
Morgan Keegan)
56 of 121 US publicly traded REITs have reduced
dividends by an average of 61% since 2008
9 of 13 office REITs have reduced dividends by average
of 46%
Other
industries
many
blue
chip
companies
have
cut
dividends drastically (JP Morgan, GE, Bank of America,
Dow
Chemical,
Alcoa,
Pfizer
all
over
50%)


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Reasons For Dividend Reduction
Proactively provide sufficient liquidity for debt maturing in
2011
Provide cash flow for lease activity in future years
Provide funding for selective acquisitions
Enhance the stability of investment grade rating


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Looking Ahead


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Objectives
If
the
economy
continues
to
falter:
Closely monitor tenant credit status
Conserve cash position to retain and attract quality
tenants and pay down debt
Strive to maintain a predictable revenue source and cash
flow
When
the
economy
begins
to
recover:
Look for accretive acquisitions
Recycle capital to improve quality of the portfolio in
anticipation of a liquidity event


©
2007
Piedmont
Office
Realty
Trust,
Inc.
Piedmont Objectives
Continue to focus on office properties
Continue to follow our low leverage strategy
Continue to pursue high quality tenants and premium
properties
Continue to be good stewards of all that has been
entrusted to us, and
Continue to creatively explore all liquidity options for
stockholders